SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 1278

ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
M/s Randeep Paper Board Mills – Appellant
Versus
The State Haryana – Respondent


Judgment

Adarsh Kumar Goel, J.

1. This petition seeks quashing of complaint under the provisions of Essential Commodities Act. In the complaint, it is alleged that on 16.12.1999, the Fertilizer Inspector checked the premises of Malhotra Traders and drew a sample of fertilizer manufactured by the petitioner company. On analysis, the sample was found to be non-standard. The petitioner made an application for re-analysis of the sample but the same has been rejected by the trial Court on the ground that there was no provision in the concerned fertilizer order entitling an accused to re-analysis and the question whether the sample had been properly analysed shall be seen at appropriate stage. Hence this petition.

2. It is contended that though there is no provision for re-testing, the petitioners were entitled to seek re-testing and rejection of application of the petitioners for re-testing was not justified. Reliance is placed on M/s Janta Agro Fertilizers v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1994 Allahabad 164 and an unreported Division Bench judgment of the Allahabad High Court in M/s Agarwal Pesticides and Chemical Industries v. State of Uttar Pradesh, decided on 29.1.1979.

3. Before consi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top