RAJENDRA NATH MITTAL, G.C.MITTAL, S.S.SANDHAWALIA
Raj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Amar Singh – Respondent
S.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.
1. Whether sub-rule (c) of Rule 11 of Order 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 applies mutatis mutandis to the memoranda of appeals by virtue of the provisions of sub-section (2) of Section 107 of the Code, is the meaningful question which in essence has necessitated this reference to a Full Bench.
2. It is manifest that the issue aforesaid is pristinely legal and any detailed reference to the facts, therefore, would be hardly relevant the more so in view of the fact that we are inclined only to decide the question of law leaving the determination on merits to the learned single Judge. If, therefore, suffices to notice that the suit preferred by the plaintiff-appellants was a usual declaratory one claiming that the sale of agricultural land specified therein by a registered deed was without necessity and consideration and therefore, not binding upon the plaintiffs and consequently not affecting their proprietary rights. The trial Court dismissed the suit on January 28, 1978. The appeal against the same was instituted on April 18, 1978, and relying on certain amendments made by the State of Haryana in the Court-fees Act the respondents took up
Mahabir Ram V/s. Kapildeo Pathak
Phaltan Bank V/s. Baburao Appajirao
Smt. Amar Kaur V/s. Iqbal Singh
C. Varadarajulu Naidu V/s. Baby Ammal
Collector, Land Acquisition V/s. Dina Nath Mahajan
Maganlal Chhagganlal (P) Ltd. V/s. Municipal Corpn. Of Greater Bombay
Pamidimkukkala Sitharamayya V/s. Ivaturi Ramayya
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.