SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(P&H) 124

R.S.NARULA
Panna – Appellant
Versus
Mukhtiar Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. In this petition of unsuccessful candidate Panna Lal Syngal for declaring void the election of Mukhtiar Singh respondent (the candidate returned to the Lok Sabha from the Rohtak Parliamentary Constituency in the general election held in March, 1971, on the allegation of commission of certain corrupt practices), following two preliminary objections were raised in the respondents written statement:-

-

1. That the petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground that the petitioner has failed to supply to the respondent copies of the annexures to the petition. The defect is a defect of presentation of the petition within the meaning of Section 81 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter called the Act), and also as required by the Rules framed by this Court in this behalf; and

2. That the petition merits dismissal on the ground that no material particulars have been given regarding the corrupt practices alleged in the petition.

2. By my order dated May 27, 1971, I permitted the Petitioner to file better particulars of the alleged corrupt practices within four weeks from that day after serving an advance copy thereof on the counsel for the respondent, who m









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top