SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(P&H) 115

S.K.KAPUR
Tin Printers Private Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Industrial Tribunal – Respondent


Judgment

S. K. Kapur, J.

1. By this writ petition the petitioners have challenged the order of the Industrial tribunal, Delhi, dated 31 August 1964. declining to accord approval to the petitioners of the action taken by them In dismissing Ved Parkash (respondent 2 ). This order was passed by the Industrial tribunal on an application by the petitioners under Sec.33 (2) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 . The petitioner-company has a factory situated at Najafgarh Road, New Delhi, and Is engaged In the printing of metal sheets. Respondent Ved Parkash was engaged by the petitioners as a lithographer In the factory, having Joined service on 1 June 1960. On three occasions charges were framed against respondent Ved Parkash. On 23 June 1962, he was charged for habitually coming late to the factory and ultimately, by an order dated 26 March 1963, he was administered a warning. He was again charesheeted on 5 July 1962, for not properly carrying out certain work en-trotted to him and after an enquiry It was ordered on 28 March 1963 that he should not be paid wages for the period of suspension from 10 September 1962 to 31 March 1963. The third charge was given to him on 7 July 1962, out

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top