SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(P&H) 124

RAJENDRA NATH MITTAL
New Suraj Transport Co. And Others – Appellant
Versus
Ruby General Ins. Co. And Others – Respondent


Judgment

1. This application has been filed by the appellants that Bela Singh, respondent No. 6, has died on April 9, 1971, and his legal representatives as detailed in para 4 should be brought on the record. This application was filed by them on March 17, 1972. The reason for delay which has been given is that appellant No. 2 has its office situated at Chandigarh and, as such, could not know in time about the death of Bela Singh. They further claim that the Code of Civil Procedure does not apply to the proceedings under the Motor Vehicles Act, 19 9, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) or to the appeals filed under section 110-D of the Act. The learned counsel for respondents 4 and 5 has vehemently contested this application and has submitted that the appeal has abated in toto on account of death of Bela Singh.

2. The first submission of the learned counsel for the appellants is that the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) has got no application to the proceedings under the Act or in appeals which are filed under section 110-D of the Act. The learned counsel for the respondents controverts this position and submits that in case of appeals in the High Court








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top