SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(P&H) 524

ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA
Ashwani Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Pardeep Kumar – Respondent


Judgment

Ashutosh Mohunta, J.

1. The tenants have filed this revision petition to challenge the order dated 14.2.1995 passed by the Rent Controller, Malerkotla, ordering the ejectment of the tenants on the ground of personal necessity of the landlord, and judgment dated 6.10.2000 passed by Appellate Authority, Sangrur, whereby the appeal filed by the tenants has been dismissed.

2. Succinctly, the respondent-landlords filed a petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for short the Act) for ejectment of the tenants from upper storey, i.e. two rooms staircase etc. on the grounds of non-payment of rent, the premises have become unfit for human habitation on account of its dilapidated condition, material impairment on the part of the tenants, as well as personal requirement of the landlords. After examining the evidence adduced on record, the Rent Controller, Malerkotla, vide order dated 14.2.1995 ordered the ejectment of the tenants on the ground of personal necessity of the landlords, whereas all other issues framed on the grounds taken by the landlord were found to have not been proved. The appeal filed by the tenants was dismissed by the Appellate








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top