SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(P&H) 905

V.S.AGGARWAL
State – Appellant
Versus
P. C. Aggarwal – Respondent


Judgment

1. By this common judgment both the Criminal Revisions Nos. 89 and 90 of 1991 can conveniently be dispose of together.

2. The relevant facts are that Deputy Chief Controller of Imports and Exports had filed a criminal complaint against the respondent and others for offences punishable under Ss. 420/468/471 and 120-B, IPC besides S. 5 of the Imports and Exports Control Act, 1947. Since the facts are not much in controversy in both the petitioners, they can well be delineated.

3. M/s. Impex Services is stated to be a partnership concern. P. N. Piplani, M. M. Piplani, C. L. Piplani and Smt. Jaya Piplani were the partners. Ravinder Kumar was the peon of shri P. C. Aggarwal. P.N. Piplani gave a general power of attorney in the name of Ravi Kumar. In fact the said Ravinder Kumar had signed as Ravi Kumar on the direction of P.C. Aggarwal. An application was sent to the Secretary, Apparel Export Promotion Council, Sahyog Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi for membership of the organisation under the signatures of Ravi Kumar. Parkash Chand was the proposer of the application. It was seconded by Mahavir Parshad. Both Parkash Chand and Mahavir Parshad were the employees of P.C. Aggarwal












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top