V.S.AGGARWAL
State – Appellant
Versus
P. C. Aggarwal – Respondent
1. By this common judgment both the Criminal Revisions Nos. 89 and 90 of 1991 can conveniently be dispose of together.
2. The relevant facts are that Deputy Chief Controller of Imports and Exports had filed a criminal complaint against the respondent and others for offences punishable under Ss. 420/468/471 and 120-B, IPC besides S. 5 of the Imports and Exports Control Act, 1947. Since the facts are not much in controversy in both the petitioners, they can well be delineated.
3. M/s. Impex Services is stated to be a partnership concern. P. N. Piplani, M. M. Piplani, C. L. Piplani and Smt. Jaya Piplani were the partners. Ravinder Kumar was the peon of shri P. C. Aggarwal. P.N. Piplani gave a general power of attorney in the name of Ravi Kumar. In fact the said Ravinder Kumar had signed as Ravi Kumar on the direction of P.C. Aggarwal. An application was sent to the Secretary, Apparel Export Promotion Council, Sahyog Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi for membership of the organisation under the signatures of Ravi Kumar. Parkash Chand was the proposer of the application. It was seconded by Mahavir Parshad. Both Parkash Chand and Mahavir Parshad were the employees of P.C. Aggarwal
Chandra Deo Singh V/s. Prokash Chandra Bose Alias Chabi Bose
Hussainara Khatoon V/s. State Of Bihar
K. M. Mathew V/s. State Of Kerala
Kailash Chaudhari V/s. State Of U.P.
Municipal Corporation Of Delhi V/s. Girdharilal Sapuru
Nasiruddin Khan V/s. State Of Bihar
Ram Chandra Prasad V/s. State Of Bihar
S. Guin V/s. Grindlays Bank Ltd.
Nirmaljit Singh Hoon V/s. The State Of West Bengal
J. P. Sharma V/s. Vinod Kumar Jain
K. M. Mathew V/s. State Of Kerala
Madheshwardhari Singh V/s. State Of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.