SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(P&H) 118

ASHOK BHAN
Om Parkash – Appellant
Versus
Ram Parkash – Respondent


Judgment

Ashok Bhan, J.

1. This revision petition has been filed by the landlord-Decree holder (hereinafter referred to as the Decree-holder) which arises from the following facts:-

2. Petitioner filed an ejectment application under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for eviction of the tenant-Judgment-debtor (hereinafter referred to as the Judgment debtor) from the premises in dispute on various grounds i.e. change of user, material structural changes affected without consent of the petitioner, causing material impairment to the value and utility of the building, non-payment of rent for four years and personal occupation as he needed to settle down at Garhshankar to start his medical practice. This petition was filed on September 27, 1975. During the pendency of the ejectment application, petitioner-Decree holder filed an application for appointment of a Local Commissioner to inspect the site in dispute and to see as to whether there was change of user of the building and whether there were any structural changes brought about by the tenant-Judgment debtor. Shri Shadi Lal, Advocate was appointed as Local Commissioner who su




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top