SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(P&H) 639

S.S.SODHI
Manjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Pepsu Road Transport Corporation – Respondent


Judgment

S. S. Sodhi, J.

1. While travelling on the roof of the Pepsu Road Transport Corporation bus PJG 7132, a branch of a tree hit Gurmail Singh, as a result of which he sustained injuries and later died. This happened at about 5.30 p. m. on June 23, 1983 on the Moga-Baghapurana Road. The Tribunal held this to be a case of contributory negligence on the ground that "the deceased by travelling on the roof of the bus had voluntarily submitted himself to the risk involved in such travelling". The compensation payable to the claimants, they being the parents, widow and children of Gurmail Singh deceased, was assessed at Rs.57,600/-, but after making the requisite deduction on account of the contributory negligence of the deceased, the amount actually awarded was only Rs.28,800/-.

2. It is now the settled position in law, as held by this court in Vijay Singh V/s. Haryana Roadways 1990 ACJ 18 (Pandh), that travelling on the roof of a bus does not per se constitute contributory negligence on the part of the bus passenger if due to the negligence of the bus driver, any injury is caused to him. It was further observed: There is a duty of care that rests upon the driver of a bus towards al






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top