BHANDARI, TEK CHAND
Commissioner Of Income-tax, Punjab, Himachal Pradesh And Bilaspur, Simla – Appellant
Versus
Shree Jagan Nath Maheshwary, Amritsar – Respondent
Tek Chand, J.
1. The main facts leading to this reference are that the assessee carried on business at Amritsar, in speculation dealings, besides, deriving income from rent and interest. For the accounting year 1938-1939, corresponding to the assessment year 1939-40, an assessment was made on a total income of Rs. 4,006/- including Rs. 2,500/- under the head business. The Income-tax Officer, Amritsar, after issuing notice, as required under Section 34 of the Income-tax Act, determined the income at Rs. 7,006/-. This assessment was set aside on appeal and fresh notices under Sections 22(2) and 34 of the Indian Income-tax Act were served on the assessee, and the proceedings that followed resulted in the income being computed at Rs. 41,833/-. This was followed by an appeal to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, who, by his order dated 11-3-1846, rejected it. This order was challenged in appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, which, by its order dated 7-8-1950, determined the assessable income at Rs. 21,814/- as against Rs. 41,833/-. The relevant paragraph from the order of the Tribunal reads as under:
"So far as the assessment for 1939-40 is concerned, the notice under Sectio
Chatturam Horil Ram Ltd. V/s. Commissioner Of Income-tax
Commissioner Of Income-tax V/s. Mahali Ram Ramji Das
Earl Beatty V/s. Inland Revenue Commissioners
India United Mills Ltd. V/s. Commissioner Of Excess Profits Tax, Bombay
Jitanram Nirmalram Firm V/s. Commissioner Of Income-tax B. And O.
Commercial Structures Ltd. V/s. Briggs
Haji Ahmad Haji Esak And Co. V/s. Commissioner Of Income-tax, Bombay City
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.