MEHTAB S.GILL, G.S.SINGHVI
Naresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
In this petition, the petitioners have prayed for quashing notice dated 7.2.2001 (Annexure P-1) issued by District Revenue Officer-cum-Collector, Yamuna Nagar (respondent No. 2) under Rule 5(1) of the Haryana Stamp (Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments) Rules, 1978 (for short, the Rules) and orders dated 4.9.2002 (Annexure P-3) and 25.2.2003 (Annexure P-5) passed by respondent No. 2 and Commissioner, Ambala Division, Ambala (hereinafter described as the Commissioner), respectively under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (for short, the Act).
2. The petitioners purchased five acres of agricultural land situated within the revenue estate of village Radaur, Sub-tehsil Raduar, District Yamuna Nagar vide sale deed No. 57 dated 9.4.1999 for a consideration of Rs. 4,00,000/- (Rs. 80,000/- per acre). They presented the sale deed for registration before Sub Registrar, Yamuna Nagar and paid stamp duty of Rs. 50,000/-. The officer concerned registered the document on that very day without raising any objection, but after a gap of about two years, respondent No. 2 issued notice Annexure P-1 to the petitioners and asked them to produce evidence in regard to value of the
Chamkaur Singh v. State of Punjab
Mahabir Prasad Santosh Kumar v. State of U.P.
Ajantha Industries v. Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi
S.N. Mukherjee v. Union of India
Shanti Prasad Agarwalla v. Union of India
M.L. Jaggi v. Mahanagar Telephones Nigam Ltd.
Travancor Rayon Ltd. v. Union of India
Woolcombers of India Limited v. Woolcombers Workers Union
Siemens Engineering and Manufacturing Company of India Limited v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.