Rameshwar Singh Malik
Mohinder Pal – Appellant
Versus
Financial Commissioner Haryana – Respondent
Mr. Rameshwar Singh Malik, J.: - The petitioner impugns the order dated 16.12.2010 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Financial Commissioner, vide which the orders dated 28.11.2007 (Annexure P-2) and 14.12.2006 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Commissioner, Ambala Division and District Collector, Ambala respectively, appointing the petitioner were set aside and respondent No.4 was appointed as Lambardar .
2. The brief facts of the case are that consequent upon the death of earlier Lambardar Sh. Ajaib Singh, one post of Lambardar of general category fell vacant in the village of the parties. Proceedings were initiated to fill up the post of Lambardar. Finally, the District Collector appointed the petitioner as Lambardar, vide order dated 14.12.2006 (Annexure P-1). Dissatisfied, respondent No.4 filed his appeal before the Commissioner, Ambala Division-respondent No.2, who dismissed the same, vide order dated 28.11.2007 (Annexure P-2). Respondent No.4 filed his revision before the Financial Commissioner and the same was allowed, vide order dated 16.12.2010 (Annexure P-3), appointing him as Lambardar in place of the petitioner.
3. Feeling aggrieved against the above said impugned order
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.