AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Panjab University Staff (Non-Teaching) Association – Appellant
Versus
Panjab University, Chandigarh – Respondent
Amol Rattan Singh, J.
These two writ petitions challenge the corrigendum issued by the respondent Panjab University (hereinafter to be referred to as the University), on 19.02.2013, in respect of an advertisement issued on 21.01.2013, by which applications for filling up 6 posts of Deputy Registrars in the University had been invited, from candidates eligible to be appointed to the said post.
By the corrigendum (Annexure P11 with both the writ petitions), the qualifications/eligibility conditions for the said post were sought to be revised.
In the advertisement dated 21.01.2013 (Annexure P8 with both the writ petitions), the following eligibility criteria/qualifications were prescribed for the post of Deputy Registrar (reproduced from the annexure itself):-
“Qualification
1. (i) Master's Degree with at least 55% marks (50% marks in case of SC/ST candidates) or equivalent grade thereof from a recognized University.
OR
Graduate with LL.B. degree with at least 55% marks (50% marks in case of SC/ST candidates) or equivalent grade thereof in both graduation and LL.B. from the r
Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission Vs. Navneet Kumar Potdar and another
Rajasthan Public Service Commission Vs. Chanan Ram and another
Deepak Aggarwal and another Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
State of Jharkhand and others Vs. Ashok Kumar Dangi and others
Tej Parkash Pathak and others Vs. Rajasthan High Court and others
Maharashtra State Mining Corporation v. Sunil
D.S. Nakara and others v. Union of India
National Textile Workers’ Union etc. v. P.R. Ramakrishnan and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.