SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 521

ANITA CHAUDHRY
Tejpal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Kushal Pal Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Amit Jain, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Avnish Mittal, Mr. Sunil Panwar, Mr. Sachin Mittal

JUDGMENT :

ANITA CHAUDHRY, J.

1. The appellants are the legal heirs of Daryao Singh. Daryao Singh had died during the pendency of his suit. His legal heirs, the appellants were impleaded as party. The pedigree table set out in the plaint would be necessary. It reads under:-

 

Chander Singh

 

Umrao Singh

Bhagwan Singh (died in 1974)

Raghu Nath Singh (Dft. No.7)

 

Harnath Singh (died in 1964)

Amar Singh @ Amir Singh (died on 12.1.92)

Daryao Singh (plaintiff)

Smt. Javtri Devi (deft. no.8)

 

 

Jaibir Singh (deft. No.5)

 

 

 

Kushal Pal Singh (deft. no.1)

Kuldeep Singh (deft. no.2)

Sandeep Kr. (deft. no.3)

 

Lalit Kumar (deft. no.4)

 

2. The property in dispute was owned by Amar Singh @ Amir Singh. He owned 162 Kanals of land situated within the revenue estate of village Mehchana, District Gurgaon. Amar Singh did not marry and died on 12.01.1992. The plaintiffs claimed that Amar Singh had left behind the plaintiffs and defendants no.7 & 8 as his legal heirs as the other two brothers namely Bhagwan Singh and Harnath had predecease
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top