IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, RAMENDRA JAIN, JJ.
PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED – PETITIONER
Vs.
THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – RESPONDENTS
Civil Writ Petition No. 26920 of 2013
Decided on : 23-12-2015
Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.
This order shall dispose of a bunch of 386 petitions viz. CWP Nos.26920, 22437, 27788, 27789 of 2013, 10554, 10560, 19587, 2343, 3297, 6844, 21260, 21260, 21774, 23041, 21860, 23397, 23454, 25146, 26316, 26323, 26371, 26559, 26589, 11405, 22928, 22947, 24389, 24390, 24391 of 2014, 28, 149, 319, 315, 423, 456, 478, 1105, 1118, 1119, 1142, 1253, 1254, 1299, 1393 , 1813, 1817, 1998, 2059, 2090, 2184, 2334, 2345, 2346, 2406, 2407, 2409, 2412, 2416, 2628, 2483, 2633, 2635, 2858, 2944, 3043, 3073, 3096, 3099, 3561, 3605, 3615, 3573, 3196, 3132, 3038, 3302, 3462, 3501, 3504, 3526, 3554, 3567, 3649, 1932, 5337, 5338, 5341, 5471, 4791, 4860, 1931, 4100, 4101, 4104, 4106, 4167, 4245, 4407, 4426, 4429, 4697, 4704, 4707, 4874, 4906, 4907, 4919, 4949, 4970, 4992, 5043, 5074, 5084, 5098, 5168, 5229, 5520, 5522, 5547, 5076, 5548, 5551, 5736, 5758, 5772, 5790, 5803, 5910, 5918, 5920, 5926, 5937, 5943, 5967, 5986, 6065, 6097, 6104, 6123, 6209, 6407, 6408, 6522, 6847, 7036, 7185, 7188, 7205, 7216, 7242, 7447, 7498, 7520, 7526, 7537, 7576, 7779, 7882, 7883, 7884, 7886, 7887, 7888, 7891 7893, 10118, 10142, 10144, 10878, 10915, 10920, 10956, 10960, 10990, 10991, 10993, 10994, 11246, 11755, 11757, 11828, 11852, 11884, 11903, 11938, 11952, 12001, 12020, 11537, 11660, 7994, 11307, 11322, 11352, 4578, 8120, 8482, 8600, 8707, 8804, 8814, 8835, 8880, 8893, 8896, 9007, 9008, 9014, 9023, 9026, 9028, 9113, 9250, 9269, 9270, 9346, 9468, 9625, 9641, 9675, 9744, 10020, 10029, 10032, 10034, 10035, 10100, 10264, 10295, 10302, 10456, 10457, 10532, 10555, 10575, 10738, 10723, 11158, 11294, 11351, 12316, 12852, 12885, 12925, 12932, 12934, 12991, 12993, 12996, 13000, 13021, 13027, 13031,13041, 13043, 13075, 13195, 13217, 13227, 13237, 13355, 13357, 13466, 13772, 13787, 13884, 13918, 14024, 4675, 11004, 10998, 7491, 11763, 13894, 14510, 14183, 13003, 15373, 15374, 15377, 15254, 15270, 15903, 16141, 16158, 16532, 16820, 16824, 16848, 16869, 16871, 16880, 15261, 15522, 15523, 15536, 15550, 15553, 15653, 15664, 15677, 16101, 16165, 16190, 16202, 16203, 16189, 16988, 17073, 17075, 17038, 17303, 15915, 17849, 16382, 17561, 17568, 17584, 17595, 18097, 18104, 18108, 18109, 18127, 18128, 18136, 18148, 18166, 18174, 18246, 18730, 18733, 18914, 18915, 19012,19290, 19292, 19295, 19390, 19233, 19421, 19543, 20660, 20686, 20691, 20840, 21451, 21539. 21561, 21584. 21644, 22058, 22263, 22278, 22414, 22426, 22432, 22560, 22544, 22692, 22812, 22813, 22814, 22821, 23416, 23658, 23936, 23940, 24099, 24509, 24598, 24681, 24689, 24692, 24695, 24701, 24799, 24803, 24842, 24851, 24946, 24954, 24999, 25012, 25015, 25200, 25064 and 22829 of 2015, as according to the learned counsel for the parties, the issue involved in all these petitions is identical. However, the facts are being extracted from CWP No.26920 of 2013.
2. The petitioner - Punjab State Power Corporation Limited is a statutory body constituted under the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. It is engaged in generation, distribution and supply of electric energy/electricity power and other allied material to the consumers viz. domestic, commercial and industrial consumers in the State of Punjab and for that purpose, it is governed by the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 and Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 as well as the Rules and Regulations framed thereunder. The petitioner had been filing returns as prescribed and whatever tax was payable in terms of Section 15 of the Punjab Value Added Tax, 2005 (in short, "the PVAT Act") was being deposited. For the year 2007-08, returns for the period from 1.4.2007 to 31.3.2008 under the PVAT Act along with requisite information in prescribed form had been filed with the authority. Thereafter, annual statement in Form VAT 20 had been filed before the last date as prescribed under section 26 of the PVAT Act and Rule 40(1) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 (in short, "the Rules"). Similarly, for the years 2008-09 and 2009-10, returns were filed in time and annual s
Anant Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited Vs. The State of Karnataka
CIT Vs. Punjab Financial Corporation
Chhatter Singh Baid Vs. Corporation of Calcutta
Gujarat Agro Industries Co. Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation of the City of Ahmedabad
Government of Andhra Pradesh Vs. P. Laxmi Devi
Har Devi Asnani Vs. State of Rajasthan
Income Tax Officer Vs. Mohammed Kunhi
M/s Elora Construction Company Vs. The Municipal Corporation of Gr. Bombay
M/s Emerald International Limited Vs. State of Punjab
Penguin Textiles Ltd. Vs. State of A.P.
Syed Mahfooz Hussain Vs. State of UP
State of U.P. Vs. Manbodhan Lal Srivastava
Soorajmull Nagarmull Vs. State of West Bengal
Shyam Kishore Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
T.C. Limited Vs. Union of India
Vijay Prakash D. Mehta/Shri Jawahar D. Mehta Vs. Collector of Customs Preventive , Bombay
Walchandnagar Industries Limited Mumbai Vs. Municipal Corporation of the City of Pune
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.