Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.

The petitioner seeks quashing of notifications dated 6.1.2006 and 9.8.2006 issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short, "the Act") and the award dated 7.12.2006, Annexures P. 2 to 4 respectively to the extent that the land owned and possessed by her for residential purpose is adjacent to the released land and surrounded by private colonizers. Further prayer has been made for releasing the land as adjoining land has already been released vide order dated 14.5.2008, Annexure P. 8 in view of the government policy discussed in the order dated 20.11.2007 passed by this Court in CWP No. 19290 of 2006 and for declaring the acquisition proceedings to have lapsed in view of provisions of section 24(2) of the Right to Fair compensation and Transparency in land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (in short, "the 2013 Act").

2. A few facts relevant for the decision of the controversy involved as narrated in the petition may be noticed. The land in question in the present petition was the subject matter of CWP No. 19290 of 2006 (Hira Lal and another vs. State of Haryana and others). In the said writ petition, the ple