SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2721

S.J.VAZIFDAR, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, AVNEESH JHINGAN
Rajiv Manchanda – Appellant
Versus
Haryana Urban Development Authority – Respondent


Advocates:
Present :Mr. A.M. Punchhi, Advocate with Mr. Anupam Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioners in Civil Writ Petition No. 22252 of 2016.
Mr. Puneet Bali, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Jain, Advocate, Mr. Ranjit Saini, Advocate, Mr. Arav Gupta, Advocate and Mr. Paramveer Singh, Advocate for the petitioners in Civil Writ Petition No. 2747 of 2017.
Mr. Narender Singh, Advocate with Mr. Satyavir Singh Yadav, Advocate and Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate for the petitioners in Civil Writ Petition No. 5927 of 2017.
Mr. B.R.Mahajan, Advocate General, Haryana with Mr. Deepak Balyan, Additional Advocate General, Haryana for the State of Haryana and Mr. Deepak Sabharwal, Advocate, Mr. Amar Vivek, Advocate, Ms. Shubhra Singh, Advocate and Mr. Sourabh Maggu, Advocate, for HUDA.

JUDGMENT

Mr. S.J. Vazifdar, CJ.:- These petitions concern the rights of the parties whose lands have been acquired to the allotment of plots in lieu thereof in addition to the compensation received under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The allotment is to an extent on a preferential basis and has come to be referred to as the ‘oustee quota’.

2. Commencing from the year 1987, policies have been introduced by the State of Haryana governing the rights of the oustees to the allotment of plots under the oustee quota. There are several issues with respect to the rights of the oustees, many of which have been the subject matter of decisions of this Court which have attained finality before the Supreme Court. There are, however, several issues relating to the interpretation of the policies and the applicability as well as the interpretation of the judgments and orders of this Court and of the Supreme Court which require consideration. From time to time we clubbed several of these petitions. Instead of disposing of all the petitions, we choose to restrict this judgment to three petitions which together cover most of the issues that require urgent consideration.

3. A Division Bench of this Co


















































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top