SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 204

HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Jai Bhagwan – Appellant
Versus
Satbir – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K. Agnihotri, Adv., Keshav Pratap Singh, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.

1. The present criminal revision has been filed by petitioner-Jai Bhagwan (complainant) being aggrieved by the judgment dated 30.11.2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Narnaul, vide which criminal appeal filed by Satbir, against the judgment and order dated 28/29.07.2008 passed by Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Mohindergarh, whereby he was convicted under Section 420 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for 3 years and to a fine of Rs.1000/- and in default thereof, to further undergo RI for three months, had been allowed.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on the complaint of Jai Bhagwan, adopted son of Sheo Chand, FIR No.451, dated 30.10.1992 under Sections 192/196/199/205/467/468/420/120-B IPC, was registered at Police Station Mohindergarh against Satbir, Jhabdu Ram and Rajbir Singh. As per complainant-Jai Bhagwan, during his lifetime, Sheo Chand had adopted the complainant as his son. When Sheo Chand was alive, the complainant used to provide him all the services. Sheo Chand expired on 20.04.1992. Satbir and Jhabdu Ram would nurse a grudge in their mind against the complainant on the aforesaid count. Vide judgment and decre


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top