SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJIV NARAIN RAINA
Ram Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jai Bharat Maruti Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Abha Rathore, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mohak Bhadana, Advocate

ORDER :

RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J.

1. This petition is filed by the workman for setting aside the order dated 3rd December, 2009 and consequential award dated 13th September, 2010 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court-I, Gurgaon. The prayer is for setting aside the illegal termination and to award reinstatement with continuity of service and other consequential benefits including full back wages. The reference has been declined. The facts are that the petitioner was employed with the respondent management on 1st March, 1990 and served till 13th October, 1995 when his services were arbitrarily and illegally dismissed. The petitioner came in conflict with the management when he became actively involved in trade union activities and was elected Joint Secretary of the workers union in 1994 and thereafter as its President from July, 1995 to 13th October, 1995. The friction between him and the management escalated and led to two charge sheets served on him one is dated 8th December, 1994 while the other is of 21st June, 1995. The petitioner filed replies to the charge sheets in detail but instead an Inquiry Officer was appointed to hold a domestic inquiry. The dispute raised by





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top