JUDGMENT

Jaishree Thakur, J. - This revision has been filed seeking to challenge the order dated 24.05.2018 passed by the Executing Court by which warrants of possession have been issued against the present petitioner for taking possession of the property, while contending that the warrants of possession dated 24.05.2018 are the outcome of a completely sham, fraudulent and mala fide proceedings initiated before the trial court at the behest of one extenant namely, Charanjit Singh.

2. This case has a chequered history and, therefore to understand the controversy, it would be necessary to highlight a few facts.

3. One Madan Lal Rambani had instituted an eviction application on 03.06.1999 against the tenant Charanjit Singh, inter-alia, on the ground that the demised premises was required for his own personal necessity, stating that he had one son namely, Vikram Rambani, aged 28 years, who was likely to be married and as such the premises would be required for his use and occupation. The said eviction petition was contested by Charanjit Singh, admitting that he had taken premises in dispute on 05.01.1971. During the pendency of the said proceedings before the Rent Controller, Madan Lal