SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(P&H) 2446

SUDIP AHLUWALIA
Santokh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar Batra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Aayush Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Naveen Bawa, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Sudip Ahluwalia, J. - This Revision Petition is directed against the impugned Orders dated 7th July, 2017 and 7th July, 2018 (Annexures P-3 and P-8), passed by the Court of Ld. Rent Controller, Ludhiana in Rent Petition No.RP/294/2016 and in Rent Appeal No.1129, dated 17th May, 2016, respectively.

2. Background of the matter is that the Ld. Rent Controller, on an earlier date (15th May, 2017), by a detailed order had determined the provisional rent along with, interest as well as the costs involved payable by the Respondent/Tenant to the Petitioner/Landlord for a composite amount of Rs. 1,72,600/-, and time was granted to the Respondent to make such payment on 7th July, 2017. On the said date, however, the Respondent paid only an amount of Rs. 72,600/- to the Petitioner, who accepted the same "without prejudice to his legal rights". Thereafter, the Ld. Rent Controller adjourned the matter to 20th July, 2017 for the remaining payment. On that date again the Petitioner received the balance of Rs. 1,00,000/- from the Respondent "without prejudice to the legal rights of the Petitioner".

3. He, thereafter, filed his Application dated 21st October, 2017 (Annexure P-7), seeking su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top