JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J.

1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.

2. In paragraph 15 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.

3. The incident started when while reversing the accused's tractor hit and broke the boundary wall. After that 4-5 persons arrived and opened fire at the complainant party.

4. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the custodial investigation would serve no purpose whatsoever, and the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.

5. Ld. counsel representing the State opposes the bail.

REASONING:

6. Ld. Sessions Court has already granted bail to one of the co-accused namely Manjit Singh. On primafacie analysis of the nature of allegations, injuries inflicted by the petitioner, and other factors peculiar to this case, there would be no justifiability for custodial or pre-trial incarcera