SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 256

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Alka Sarin, J.
Gurpreet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India, Narcotics Control Bureau, Chandigarh & Anr. – Respondents
CRM-M-7227-2021 (O&M)
Decided On : 17-08-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ruhani Chadha, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for the respondent-NCB, for the Respondent

The limited purpose of examining bail applications under Section 37 of the NDPS Act is to focus on the availability of reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of the offences charged and is unlikely to commit an offence under the Act while on bail.

Headnote:

NDPS Act - Grant of Regular Bail - Sections 8, 22, 29, 60 - Section 37 - Summary of the judgment: The court dismissed the petition for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in a case under Sections 8, 22, 29, and 60 of the NDPS Act, considering the heavy commercial quantity of narcotics involved and the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act. The court also referred to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Mohit Aggarwal [2022 AIR (SC) 3444] and emphasized the limited purpose of examining bail applications under Section 37 of the Act.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought regular bail in a case involving illegal sale and purchase of contraband drug Tramadol under the NDPS Act. The recovery in the present case was of heavy commercial quantity of narcotics.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the recovery in the present case was heavy commercial quantity, attracting the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, and dismissed the petition for grant of regular bail.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner was eligible for grant of regular bail considering the heavy commercial quantity of narcotics involved and the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the limited purpose of examining bail applications under Section 37 of the NDPS Act and considered the heavy commercial quantity of narcotics involved in reaching its decision.

Final Decision: The petition for grant of regular bail was dismissed by the court.

JUDGMENT

Alka Sarin, J. - This is the second petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in Crime Case No.23 dated 06.05.2019 under Sections 8, 22, 29 and 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short 'NDPS Act') registered in Police Station Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB), Chandigarh.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the first bail petition of the petitioner being CRM-M-40773-2019 was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 17.12.2020. Learned counsel would further contend that the petitioner has been in custody for a considerably long time i.e. since 06.05.2019. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further contend that there has been a violation of Section 42 of the NDPS Act.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent-NCB has referred to the reply filed by the NCB wherein it has been stated that the bail petition of the co-accused being CRM-M-10050-2021 titled Jaswinder Singh Grewal Vs. Union of India was dismissed on 24.08.2021 and that of another co-accused being CRM-M-44719-2019 titled Abhishek Sharma Vs. Union Of India was dismissed on 23.09.2020. Learned counsel for the respondent-NCB has further contended that the modus operandi of the main accused, Abhishek Sharma, was that he purchased capsules and tablets of Tramadol Hydrochloride from the manufacturer and thereafter sold it in the open market through Gurpreet Singh (petitioner herein), Amit Uppal, Jasvir Singh and Shubham Bhalla. Recovery in the present case is of 2,16,400 tablets/capsules of Tramadol Hydrochloride. It is further the contention of learned counsel for the respondent-NCB that the petitioner does not deserve the concession of bail especially in the light of the provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act in view of the recovery of heavy commercial quantity of narcotics. Learned counsel would further contend that the petitioner was named in the secret information. Further, reliance has been placed upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Narcotics Control Bureau Vs. Mohit Aggarwal [2022 AIR (SC) 3444].

4. Heard.

5. In the present case, on 16.05.2019 specific information was received by T. Anil Kumar, Intelligence Officer from a reliable source that the persons namely, Gurpreet Singh (petitioner herein) s/o Mukhtyar Singh, Amit Uppal s/o Late Sardar Ramesh Chander and Jasvir Singh s/o Late Sardar Ajaib Singh, all aged between 40 and 45, were involved in illegal sale and purchase of contraband drug Tramadol under the NDPS Act. It was also the information received that a huge quantity of Tramadol capsules and tablets would be received by Gurpreet Singh (petitioner herein) near Raj Road Carrier in Transport Nagar, Ludhiana and he would sell this consignment to Jasveer Singh and others without sale and purchase invoice between 1500 hours to 1600 hours. The said information was reduced into writing and placed before the Officiating Zonal Director, NCB Chandigarh Zonal Unit. The NCB Team reached Transport Nagar, Ludhiana at about 1400 hours and at about 04.30 p.m. one white coloured I-20 car bearing Registration No.PB-10-FD-6080 came and stopped at a little distance in front of Raj Road Carrier. One person from the driver's seat came out and went to two persons who were already present there and after some time, three persons came back with one cardboard box and placed it in the dicky of the car. As soon as the three persons closed the dicky of the car, the officials of the NCB Team reached near them and IO Rajneesh introduced himself and his team to them and asked for their introduction. One of the persons introduced himself as Amit Uppal, second person introduced himself as Shubham Bhalla and third person introduced himself as Jasvir. It was noticed that one person was sitting in the car and he introduced himself as Harpreet Singh. The NCB team asked them as to what they had placed in the dicky. At first they tried to ignore then

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top