ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Meenu Vinayak – Appellant
Versus
Sunny Vinayak – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. (Oral). - Prayer in this petition is for transfer of the petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, titled as Sunny Vinayak vs. Meenu Vinayak, pending before the Family Court, Jagadhri to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Kaithal.
2. While issuing notice of motion on 02.12.2021, the following order was passed:
'Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that in order to attend the proceedings initiated by the respondent-husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 at Jagadhri the petitioner would need to travel a distance of about 110 kilometres (one way) and, hence, she would not be able to properly defend her case. It is further contended that two other cases initiated by the petitioner being MNT125/141/2021 titled as 'Meenu and Etc. vs. Sunny Vinayak' under Section 125 CrPC and a complaint under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Act bearing No.COMA 103 of 2021 titled as 'Meenu vs. Sunny Vinayak' are already pending at Kaithal.
Notice of motion returnable 07.01.2022.'
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that on account of the afores
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.