Back
RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Jagdeep Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajesh Bhardwaj, J (Oral). - Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the pendency of this petition, petitioner No.2-Pushpa Bhatia expired.
2. In view of the above, Petition qua petitioner No.2 stands dismissed as infructuous. Now petition survives only qua petitioner No.1 namely, Jagdeep Bhatia.
3. Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing of FIR No.123, dated 16.10.2016, under Sections 406 and 498-A of IPC, registered at Police Station Women District Ludhiana along with subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 02.04.2019 (Anneuxre P-2).
4. FIR in question was got registered by complainant-respondent No.2 and the investigation commenced thereon. However, with the intervention of respectables, finally the parties arrived at settlement and they resolved their inter se dispute, which is apparent from compromise. On the basis of the compromise (Annexure P-2), the petitioners are invoking the inherent power of this Court by praying that continuation of these proceedings would be a futile exercise and an abuse of process of the Court and thus, the FIR in question and all the subsequent proceedings
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the power to quash a criminal proceeding under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of t....
Quashing of FIR based on a compromise between the parties is justified when it would secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of the Court.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that when parties have amicably settled their dispute, the continuation of criminal proceedings may be an abuse of process of the Court, and quashi....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the power to quash a criminal proceeding based on a compromise must be exercised to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the pro....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the power of the High Court to quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised in accordance with the principles of s....
The main legal principle established is that when parties have voluntarily settled their dispute, the court may quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to secure the ends of justice.
The court's decision was primarily based on the nature of the offenses, the voluntary compromise between the parties, and the precedents set by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the High Court in similar....
The power of the Court to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, as provided in Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Section 320 Cr.P.C., should be exercised to secure the ends of j....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that when parties have entered into a compromise, continuation of criminal proceedings may be an abuse of process of the Court, and quashing the pr....
The main legal point established is that when parties have entered into a compromise, the court may quash criminal proceedings if continuation would be an abuse of process of the court and securing t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
