Back
RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Attar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajesh Bhardwaj, J (Oral). - Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying for quashing of FIR No.275 dated 4.11.2019 under Sections 326-B, 354, 354-A(1)(iii) and 506 IPC registered at Police Station, Narwana Sadar, District Jind and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of the compromise dated 20.1.2020(Annexure P-2).
2. FIR in question was got registered by complainant-respondent No.2 and the investigation commenced thereon. However, with the intervention of respectables, finally the parties arrived at settlement and they resolved their inter se dispute, which is apparent from the compromise(Annexure P-2). On the basis of the same, the petitioners are invoking the inherent power of this Court by praying that continuation of these proceedings would be a futile exercise and an abuse of process of the Court and thus, the FIR in question and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom may be quashed in the interest of justice.
3. This Court vide orders dated 7.3.2022 directed the parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate for recording their statements, as contended before the Court, and the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate was al
The power of the High Court to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties must be exercised to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of the Court.
The main legal principle established is that when parties have voluntarily settled their dispute, the court may quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to secure the ends of justice.
The power of the Court to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, as provided in Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Section 320 Cr.P.C., should be exercised to secure the ends of j....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the power of the High Court to quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised in accordance with the principles of s....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the power to quash a criminal proceeding based on a compromise must be exercised to secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the pro....
Quashing of FIR based on a compromise between the parties is justified when it would secure the ends of justice and prevent abuse of the process of the Court.
The main legal point established is that when parties have entered into a compromise, the court may quash criminal proceedings if continuation would be an abuse of process of the court and securing t....
The court's decision was primarily based on the nature of the offenses, the voluntary compromise between the parties, and the precedents set by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the High Court in similar....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that when parties have amicably settled their dispute, the continuation of criminal proceedings may be an abuse of process of the Court, and quashi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that when parties have entered into a compromise, continuation of criminal proceedings may be an abuse of process of the Court, and quashing the pr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
