ANOOP CHITKARA
Sukhdeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
318 | 06.12.2019 | Lehra, Distt. Sangrur | 354, 323, 354-D IPC and Section 3& 4 of SC & ST Act |
Criminal Case no. before trial Court | SC No.145/2021 CNR No.PBSG010051582021 |
1. Aggrieved by the dismissal of his bail under section 438 CrPC, the accused has come up before this court by filing an appeal under section 14-A of Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, (SCSTPOA), seeking bail.
2. The appellant had filed a bail application before the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur, which was dismissed on 30.05.2022.
3. In Prathvi Raj v. Union of India, AIR 2020 SC 1036, a three-judge bench of Supreme Court read down S. 18 by declaring as follows,
[10]. Concerning the applicability of provisions of section 438 Cr.PC, it shall not apply to the cases under Act of 1989. However, if the complaint does not make out a prima facie case for applicability of the provisions of the Act of 1989, the bar created by section 18 and 18A (i) shall not apply.
4. In paragraph 14 of the bail application, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.
5. Ld. Counsel for the appellant contends that the custodial investigation would ser
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.