IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Alka Sarin, J.
Malook Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M-10319 of 2022 (O&M)
Decided On : 31-05-2022
NDPS Act - Bail Application - The court granted regular bail to the petitioner under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, considering the petitioner's prolonged custody, the likelihood of a lengthy trial, and the fact that the petitioner was a first-time offender. The court also noted that there was no other case pending against the petitioner.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a second petition for grant of regular bail in a case under Section 21 of the NDPS Act, stating that he had been falsely implicated and had been in custody for over 2 years. The alleged recovery of heroin was found to be Tramadol Hydrochloride upon FSL Report.
Finding of the Court:
The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, considering the prolonged custody, the likelihood of a lengthy trial, and the fact that the petitioner was a first-time offender.
Issues: The main issue was the grant of regular bail to the petitioner under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Ratio Decidendi: The court decided to grant bail based on the petitioner's prolonged custody, the likelihood of a lengthy trial, and the fact that the petitioner was a first-time offender.
Final Decision: The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, with the provision for the Prosecution to apply for cancellation of bail if the petitioner misused the concession of bail.
JUDGMENT
Auka Sarin, J. - This is a second petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in FIR No.04 dated 08.08.2019 under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) registered at Police Station SSOC Fazilka, District Ferozepur (Punjab). The first petition being CRM- M-33645-2020 was dismissed as withdrawn on 09.12.2020.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case and that he has been in custody for a period of 02 years, 09 months and 14 days. The learned counsel would further contend that there is no other case pending against the petitioner and out of eight prosecution witnesses only three stand examined. It is further the case of the learned counsel that when the alleged recovery is stated to have been made from the petitioner it was stated to be heroin, however, on receipt of the FSL Report it transpired that the same was Tramadol Hydrochloride.
3. The State counsel has filed the custody certificate as well as the status report by way of affidavit of Harkamalpreet Singh Khakh, PPS, Assistant Inspector General of Police, State Special Operation Cell, Fazilka wherein it has been submitted that FIR No.04 dated 08.08.2019 under Section 21/61/85 of the NDPS Act, Police State Special Operation Cell, District Fazilka was registered on the complaint of ASI Rohit Maroofia against Sukhchain Singh @ Chaina, Major Singh and the present petitioner. Thereafter, after following the due procedure of law, Sukhchain Singh @ Chaina and Malook Singh were apprehended by the Police party at the spot whereas Major Singh fled from the spot. On questioning by Jasbir Singh, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Counter Intelligence, Ferozepur, Sukhchain Singh alias Chaina stated that he had hidden heroin in a polythene packet at the back of their house near tubewell pump buried near the trunk of the guava tree and he can get the same recovered and on questioning the petitioner he stated that he had hidden heroin in a polythene packet at the back of his house buried near the wall at the south side of the house and he can get the same recovered from the spot. Thereafter, recovery is stated to have been effected from the place as disclosed by the petitioner. The packet was sealed and after following due procedure of law was sent for FSL Report. As per the FSL Report the ingredient of the recovered powder was found to be Tramadol Hydrochloride. The learned State counsel is not in a position to deny that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.08.2019 and that there is no other case pending against the petitioner. The learned State counsel is also not in a position to deny that out of total eight prosecution witnesses only three have been examined till date.
4. Heard.
5. Keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has been in custody for a period of 02 years, 09 months and 14 days and the trial is likely to take time, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in detention any longer. It is also to be noted that there is no other case pending against the petitioner and the petitioner is a first time offender.
6. Keeping in view the totality of circumstances and without commenting on the merits of the case, I deem it appropriate to grant the concession of regular bail to the petitioner. The petitioner is directed to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Illaqa Magistrate/Duty Magistrate/Trial Court concerned.
7. However, the Prosecution will always be at liberty to apply for cancellation of bail in case the petitioner is found to be misusing the concession of bail in any manner.
8. It is also made clear that any observation made herein shall not be treated as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.
9. Disposed off Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed off.
The court may grant regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, considering factors such as prolonged custody, the likelihood of a lengthy trial, and the offender's crimin....
The court may grant regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, considering factors such as clean antecedents, minimal progress in the case, and the petitioner being a fir....
The delay in sending the sample to FSL Mohali and the petitioner's custody duration were considered as mitigating circumstances for granting regular bail.
The limited purpose of examining bail applications under Section 37 of the NDPS Act is to focus on the availability of reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not guilty of the offences ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court may grant regular bail considering the prolonged custody of the accused and the slow progress of the trial, despite the recovery of ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which focuses on the availability of reasonable grounds for believing that the accused is not ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.