VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Nisha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J. - The present petition invokes the jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'CrPC') for quashing of the order dated 16.03.2020 (Annexure P-1) passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtak, whereby the application dated 28.11.2019 (Annexure P-2) submitted by the petitioner under Section 311 CrPC in case FIR No.325 dated 02.08.2014 registered under Sections 420, 406, 419, 467, 471 and 120-B Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as 'IPC') at Police Station City Rohtak has been dismissed.
2. Briefly the facts of the case are being enumerated as under:-
i. A complaint dated 02.08.2014 (Ex. PW-2/A) was submitted by B.S. Sodi, Manager of the SBI, Anaj Mandi Branch, Rohtak with regard to a fraudulent transaction in a sum of Rs.30,000/- from the account of Azad Singh on 01.08.2014 that led to registration of the FIR against the petitioner along with others.
ii. After conclusion of the investigation, a final report was filed against the petitioner as well as co-accused Mayank, Praveen and Rohit Kumar, whose names figured in the disclosure statement of petitioner.
iii. FSL report was received by
Mannan Shaikh and Others vs. State of West Bengal and Another 2014(13) SCC 59
Natasha Singh vs. CBI (State) : (2013) 5 SCC 741
Ratanlal vs. Prahlad Jat and Others 2017(9) SCC 340
Swapan Kumar Chatterjee vs. Central Bureau of Investigation 2019(14) SCC 328.
V. N. Patil Vs K Niranjan Kumar
Vijay Kumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another 2011(8) SCC 136.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.