SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2676

UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Mehboob Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Applicant :Mumtaz Ali Advocate.
For the Opposite Party : G.A.

JUDGMENT

Umesh Chandra Sharma, J.

Heard Sri Shad Khan holding brief of Sri Mumtaz Ali, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Pankaj Kumar Tripathi, learned A.G.A. For the State and perused the record.

2. This application has been moved for quashing the order dated 20.10.2022 passed by A.S.J Court No. 2 Bulandshahr whereby he rejected the application under section 311 Cr.P.C for recalling the witnesses PW-2, PW-3, PW-6, PW-8 and also to direct the learned trial court to recall the aforesaid witnesses for cross examination for proper and fair adjudication of S.T. No. 1401 of 2010 arising out of crime no. 203 of 2009, under section 147, 148, 149, 302 and 120-B I.P.C Police Station Sikandrabad District - Bulandshahr.

3. In brief, facts of the case are that during the course of the trial the applicant has been in jail since 20.12.2010. Seven Session trial cases are consolidated together and leading case is S.T. No. 853 of 2009, the applicant is a very poor person. Due to non payment of fees, local counsel did not cross examine PW-2 Rizwan Ansari, PW-3 S.I Hari Singh, PW-6 Mohsin and PW-8 I.O Virendra Singh. The applicant somehow recently engaged Mr. Krishn Kumar Saxena advocate as his co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top