SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 636

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Fateh Deep Singh, J.
Kamlesh Kumari & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Gian Singh & Ors. – Respondents
FAO No.2217 of 2002 (O&M)
Decided On : 25-04-2022

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate for the Appellants.; None for Respondents No.1 And 2.; Mr. R.C. Kapoor, Advocate for Respondent No.3.

The main legal principle established is the consideration of the deceased's employment, dependency of the claimants, and the impact of the death on the family in determining the compensation amount in motor accident claims.

Headnote:

Compensation - Motor Accident Claims Tribunal - The court awarded compensation to the claimants for the death of the deceased in a motor accident, considering the deceased's employment, dependency of the claimants, loss of consortium, and last rites and ceremonies.

Fact of the Case:

The claimants appealed against an Award by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, seeking compensation for the death of the deceased in a motor accident.

Finding of the Court:

The court found in favor of the claimants, modifying the award to Rs. 16,06,960/- for loss of dependency, loss of consortium, and last rites and ceremonies, with interest at 9% p.a. from the date of the accident.

Issues: The issues framed by the Tribunal included the cause of the accident, amount of compensation, maintainability of the petition, and relief.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the deceased's employment, dependency of the claimants, and the impact of the death on the family in determining the compensation amount.

Final Decision: The appeal was disposed of, and the award was modified to provide compensation to the claimants.

JUDGMENT

Fateh Deep Singh, J. - This appeal has come about by the claimants against an Award dated 05.12.2001 in MACT Case No.36/2001 whereby the Court of learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Karnal while jointly deciding this claim petition with another matter had allowed the claim awarding total compensation of Rs. 8,70,000/- with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount. It was the claim of the claimants that deceased Rajbir Singh husband of claimant Santosh Kumari appellant was working with the Food Corporation of India (FCI) and on the fateful day i.e. 01.06.1999 while going on a scooter bearing registration No.HR05B-9815 was hit by the offending tractor bearing No.HR05B-1045 which was being drivenrashly and negligently at a high speed by respondent Gian Singh and which vehicle was owned by then respondent Kanwar and insured with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. as a result of which both the occupants had died.

2. The respondent owner of the driver denied the accident being an outcome of rash and negligent driving while the insurer denied for want of knowledge. The Tribunal framed the following issues:-

    1. Whether the accident in question resulting into the death of Satish Kumar deceased caused due to rash and negligent driving of vehicle No.HR-05-B-1045 by respondent No.l? OPP

    2. To what amount of compensation, the claimants are entitled and from whom? OPP

    3. Whether the present petition is not maintainable? OPR

    4. Relief.

    3. The claimants examined PW1 Kishan Lai, PW2 claimant Santosh Kumari, PW3 Kamlesh, PW4 Ved Parkash, PW5 Krishan Kumar and tendered documents while respondents examined one Kanwar Singh as PW1 leading to passing of the impugned Award.

    4. It would not be out of place to refer here that the records of this case stood destroyed in a fire that engulfed the record room of thisCourt and that is how the Court with limited recreated documents has to decide the present matter.

    5. Learned counsel for the two sides at the very onset have made statement that they do not want to contest on the question of findings on issue No.l as nothing has come on the records by way of evidence to deny the factum of accident resulting in the death of deceased. The only rallying point that was hotly debated by the two sides is over the very quantum of compensation to which the claimants are entitled to. It is not displaced that Santosh Kumari appellant is the widow of the deceased while others namely Meenakshi, Parveen Kumar and Amit Kumar are minor children of the deceased while Kesho Devi is mother of the deceased.

    6. The contentions on behalf of the appellants by Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate that the deceased was employed with FCI is not at all displaced by any means. PW5 Krishan Kumar an official of the FCI had proved the employment of the deceased and the certificate of his salary Ex.Pl issued by the FCI office at Karnal. The salary certificate shows his earnings to be Rs. 9840/- per month and which is not at all displaced. The deceased at the time of his death was aged around 40 years. Had the deceased been alive, he would have been spending money on his own upkeep and maintenance and therefore, deduction of l/3rd by the Tribunal is slightly on the higher side keeping in view that there are five dependents left behind by the deceased, and therefore, tothe mind of this Court the deduction ought to have been around l/5th. Keeping in view the age of the deceased, the Tribunal had wrongly applied multiplier of 11 which ought to be 15 and therefore, per month contribution by the deceased and the dependency of the claimants comes to Rs. 7,872/- and the annual dependency is Rs. 94,464/- and applying the multiplier of 15 the compensation amount comes to Rs. 14,16,960/-. Besides this, the wife has lost her husband, the minor children their father, a source of love, affection and protection, and a source of inspiration for all times to come and which death has caused an irreparable and irrevocabl

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top