VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Ankit – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
ORDER
Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J. - The challenge in the instant revision petition is to the judgment dated 02.12.2021 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Sonepat in CRA.35/2021 as well as to the judgment of conviction dated 09.03.2021 and the order of sentence dated 12.03.2021 passed by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Sonepat whereby the petitioners have been convicted for commission of offence punishable under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'the IPC) and Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short 'the POCSO Act'). Vide order of sentence dated 12.03.2021, the following sentence was imposed upon the petitioners that were to run concurrently :-
Name | Under Section | Imprisonment |
1. Ankit, son of Sh. Manoj, resident of village khandrai, Gohana City, Sonepat, | Section 10 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 | Imprisonment for a period of 2 years and fine of Rs. 1000/-. In default of payment of |
fine, he shall be further imprisoned for 30 days of simple imprisonment | ||
1. Ankit, son of Sh. Manoj, resident of village khandrai, Gohana City, Sonepat, | Section 377 ofIPC | Impri |
Dalbir Singh versus State of Harvana reported as 2003 (1) RCR(Cri) 727
Ganesan versus State represented by its Inspector of Police reported as 2020 (10) SCC 573
Prahlad versus State of Raiasthan reported as 2019 (1) RCR(Cri) 78
State of Himachal Pradesh versus Manga Singh reported as 2019 (16) SCC 759
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.