SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 653

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J.
Harwinder Kaur - Appellant
Versus
Jagdeep Singh Brar - Respondent
TA-1296-2022 (O&M)
Decided On : 27-10-2022

Advocates:
Mr. Mohit Garg, Advocate for the petitioner., for the Appellant; ; , for the Respondent

The convenience of the female litigant and the economic and social circumstances of the parties are crucial factors in considering the transfer of matrimonial disputes under the Hindu Marriage Act.

Headnote:

Transfer - Hindu Marriage Act - The court allowed the transfer of a petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act from one court to another, considering the convenience of the female litigant and the economic and social circumstances of the parties involved.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought the transfer of a petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act from one court to another due to the distance between the two locations and the petitioner's difficulty in defending the case while taking care of her one-month-old child.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the transfer petition, considering the convenience of the female litigant, the economic soundness of both parties, and the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society. The court also directed the parties to appear before the new court and encouraged mediation for an amicable settlement.

Issues: The main issue was the transfer of the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act from one court to another, taking into consideration the convenience and circumstances of the parties involved.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the convenience of the female litigant, the economic and social circumstances of the parties, and the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society as the basis for allowing the transfer of the petition.

Final Decision: The court allowed the transfer of the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Patiala, with specific conditions for the parties to follow.

JUDGMENT

Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. (Oral). - Prayer in this petition is for transfer of the petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending before the Family Court, Ferozepur to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Patiala.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the petitioner is having no independent source of income and is facing great difficulty in prosecuting the petition filed by the respondent, as there is a distance of about 223 kms between Patiala and Ferozepur. It is further submitted that the petitioner is having one month old child, who is living in her care and custody and she is facing difficulty to defend the case, as she has to travel from Patiala to Ferozepur.

3. Learned counsel has relied upon the judgments Sumita Singh Vs. Kumar Sanjay, 2002 SC 396 and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi Vs. Kishor Babulal Pardeshi, 2005(12) SCC 237, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that while deciding the transfer application, the Courts are required to give more weightage and consideration to the convenience of the female litigants and transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to another should ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their convenience and the Courts should desist from putting female litigants under undue hardships.'

4. Learned counsel has further relied upon N.C.V. Aishwarya Vs. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha, 2022 Live Law (SC) 627, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under: -

    'The cardinal principle for exercise of power under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife's convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer.

    Further, when two or more proceedings are pending in different Courts between the same parties which raise common question of fact and law, and when the decisions in the cases are interdependent, it is desirable that they should be tried together by the same Judge so as to avoid multiplicity in trial of the same issues and conflict of decisions.'

    5. It is well settled that while considering the transfer of a matrimonial dispute/case at the instance of the wife, the Court is to consider family condition of the wife, custody of the minor child, economic condition of the wife, her physical health and earning capacity of the husband and most important, convenience of the wife i.e. she cannot travel alone without assistance of a male member of her family, connectivity of the place to and fro from her place of residence as well as bearing of the litigation charges and travelling expenses.

    6. After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, considering the fact that issuance of notice to the respondent has the consequences of staying further proceedings before the trial Court, otherwise the petitioner-wife will have to bear the litigation expenses and transportation expenses and in view of the fact that even in case notice of motion is issued, even the respondent/husband has to bear the litigation expenses and in view of the judgments in Sumita Singh's case (supra), Rajani Kishor Pardeshi's case (supra) and N.C.V. Aishwarya's case (supra) passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court deem it appropriate to allow the present petition, subject to the following conditions:-

      1. The petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending before the Family Court, Ferozepur will be tra

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top