IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J.
Rattan Singh - Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRR-1877-2008(O&M)
Decided On : 11-10-2022
Accident - Criminal Law - [IPC Section 304-A] - [Section 304-A IPC] - The court discussed the identification of the accused, discrepancies in the vehicle number, and the medical evidence of the injured witness. The court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 304-A IPC based on the eyewitness testimonies and the identification of the accused at the scene of the accident. The court also referred to legal principles regarding the necessity of a test identification parade and the imposition of sentence in cases of rash and negligent driving.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved an accident where the accused, driving a truck, collided with a scooter resulting in the death of one person and injuries to another. The prosecution presented eyewitness testimonies and medical evidence to establish the accused's guilt.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the accused guilty of rash and negligent driving leading to the accident based on the eyewitness testimonies and identification of the accused at the scene. The court also addressed the discrepancies in the vehicle number and the medical evidence of the injured witness.
Issues: The issues included the identification of the accused, discrepancies in the vehicle number, and the medical evidence of the injured witness.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the eyewitness testimonies and the identification of the accused at the scene to establish guilt. The court also discussed the necessity of a test identification parade and referred to legal principles regarding the imposition of sentence in cases of rash and negligent driving.
Final Decision: The court upheld the conviction of the accused under Section 304-A IPC and modified the sentence to a period of 06 months, considering the age of the occurrence and the accused being a first-time offender.
JUDGMENT
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J. - The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 05.08.2008 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Moga, vide which the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 10.04.2007 passed by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Zira, has been dismissed.
2. The brief facts of the case are that on 29.03.1999 SI Balvir Singh along with other police officials were on patrolling duty on their Government vehicle which was driven by Virsa Singh and they were present at chowk Dharamkot. Then they learned that one truck had caused an accident with a scooter and the injured had been taken to Civil Hospital Kot Ise Khan. Then SI Balvir Singh along with other police officials reached Civil Hospital Kot Ise Khan where the Investigating Officer further came to know that the injured has been referred to Civil Hospital Moga. Then the Investigating Officer along with police officials reached there where the attending doctor gave the opinion that injured was fit to make statement. The statement of injured Gurtej Singh was recorded. In the said statement Gurtej Singh stated that he was a resident of Dharamkot and doing the work of farming. Gurdip Singh son of Gurmail Singh resident of Pakhi Kalan, Police Station Faridkot is their relative. On 28.03.1999, he had come to meet them. Today he (complainant) along with said Gurdip Singh were going on their scooter No.PB-29/1556 towards their field.
The scooter was driven by Gurdip Singh. At some distance behind them Raj Singh son of Nihal Singh resident of Lohgarh Road, Dharamkot was also coming. The complainant further stated that when they reached near the Dhaba of Sham Singh, it was about 4/5 PM, when from the front side one truck No.PB-13G/3056 in which some passengers were travelling came at a high speed. The truck driver hit his truck into their scooter. Due to the said accident the scooter fell down on the ground and they also fell down on ground. The truck after hitting the scooter also turned towards one side and passengers travelling in the said truck also suffered injuries. The name of the truck driver came to be known later on as Rattan Singh @ Pehalwan (petitioner) resident of Jalalabad (W), District Ferozepur. The complainant further stated that the above said truck driver while driving his truck at a high speed in a negligent way without blowing the horn had caused the accident. While Gurdip Singh died at the spot, he (complainant) also suffered injuries. He was first taken to Civil Hospital Kot Ise Khan from where he was further referred to Civil Hospital, Moga. The truck driver after the accident ran away from the place of occurrence.
3. On the above said statement of the complainant, SI Balvir Singh made his endorsement and sent a ruqa and got lodged the FIR. The investigation began and the inquest report of the dead body of Gurdip Singh was prepared and the postmortem of the dead body was got conducted. The site plan of the place of occurrence was prepared. The statements of other witnesses were recorded. The vehicle involved in the accident i.e. truck and scooter were taken into police custody. Photographs of the place of occurrence were taken. Arrest of the accused was got effected on 14.04.1999. His driving licence along with other papers of the truck were taken into police custody. After completion of investigation and other formalities, the challan was filed in the Court against the petitioner.
4. Finding a prima facie case against the accused/petitioner under Section 304-A IPC, charges were framed against him. He pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.
5. At the trial the prosecution examined PW1-Dr. Mahesh Chander Markan, PW2-Onkar Singh, Head Mechanic, PW3-Chamkaur Singh, Photographer, PW4-Gurtej Singh complainant/eye-witness, PW6-SI Balvir Singh and thereafter, the prosecution closed its evidence.
6. After closure of prosecution evidence, the statement of the acc
Jaswant Singh Versus State of Punjab 2020(1) RCR(Cri) 163
Munshi Singh Gautam v. State of M.P. 2005(1) RCR(Cri) 361: 2005(1)
Ravi Kapur Versus State of Rajasthan
Sheo Shankar Singh v State of Jharkhand and Anr.
Negligence in driving leading to fatality can be established without a test identification parade if the identity is corroborated by credible witnesses.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principles of rash and negligent driving, valid identification of the accused, and the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in dete....
The absence of a test identification parade does not invalidate court identification if corroborated by reliable evidence, and minor inconsistencies in witness statements do not undermine the prosecu....
Acquittal in revision as driver and vehicle identity unproved: no initial registration details, color mismatch, absent test identification parade, unreliable dock identification by strangers, hearsay....
Purpose of a prior test identification is to test and strengthen trustworthiness of that evidence.
Conviction under rash driving provisions set aside in revision for failure to prove driver's identity: no investigation explanation, no test identification parade, unreliable dock identification by p....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.