SANJAY VASHISTH
Jagdeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjay Vashisth, J. (Oral) - The present petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C., has been filed by the petitioners, for quashing of FIR No. 200, dated 02.08.2019 (Annexure P-1), for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 506 of IPC, at Police Station Lehra, District Sangrur, and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 25.12.2020 (Annexure P-2).
2. Vide order dated 13.01.2021, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. The trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate was to submit a report in this regard giving certain details as enumerated in the said order.
3. Pursuant to the order dated 13.01.2021, passed by this Court, the parties have appeared before learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Moonak, and as per report dated 16.03.2021, submitted to this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court. The operative part of the report received from learned Court below is as under:-
'It is submitted that after recording all these statements, the report as called from this Court is
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another
Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others v. State of Gujarat and another
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of compromise in modern society and the need to exercise the power under Section 482 to prevent abuse of the process of court and se....
The court emphasized the power of the court to quash proceedings to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, especially in cases of compromise between the parties.
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, especially in cases where a genuine compromise between th....
The voluntary nature of the compromise and the court's power to prevent abuse of the process of law by quashing proceedings based on genuine compromises.
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine and voluntary compromise between the parties, considering the nature of the....
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings based on a genuine compromise between private parties to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the....
The court emphasized the significance of compromise in modern society and the wide power of the court to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of law and secure the ends....
The court can exercise its power under Section 482 to quash criminal proceedings if the compromise between the parties is genuine and voluntary, and the pendency of the litigation would be an abuse o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's power to quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine compromise between the parties, in order to prevent abuse of process of law and ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties to prevent abuse of process of law an....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.