IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sanjay Vashisth, J.
Neha & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Haryana & Anr. – Respondents
CRM-M-29731-2022
Decided On : 19-09-2022
Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - IPC 420 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., Section 420 of IPC - The court referred to the legal principles laid down in the cases of Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab, Mrs. Shakuntala Sawhney v. Mrs. Kaushalya Sawhney, Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur v. State of Gujarat, and Ramgopal v. State of Madhya Pradesh. The court emphasized the power of the court to quash proceedings to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, especially in cases of compromise between the parties.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners filed a petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C., seeking to quash FIR No. 323, dated 29.09.2021, for the offences punishable under Section 420 of IPC, based on a compromise dated 29.06.2022. The affected parties appeared before the trial Court and got their statements recorded with regard to the compromise.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the compromise between the private parties was genuine and entered into with their free will and consent, and that the pendency of the criminal litigation would be an abuse of process of law. The court accepted the petition and quashed the FIR and consequential proceedings in view of the compromise.
Issues: The main issue was whether the pendency of the criminal litigation based on the FIR would be an abuse of process of law in view of the compromise between the private parties.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the legal principles laid down in various cases to emphasize the power of the court to quash proceedings to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, especially in cases of compromise between the parties.
Final Decision: The petition was accepted, and FIR No. 323, dated 29.09.2021, for the offences punishable under Section 420 of IPC, and all consequential proceedings were quashed in view of the compromise dated 29.06.2022.
JUDGMENT
Sanjay Vashisth, J. - The present petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C., has been filed by the petitioners, for quashing of FIR No. 323, dated 29.09.2021 (Annexure P-1), for the offences punishable under Section 420 of IPC, at Police Station Dharuhera, District Rewari, and all the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 29.06.2022 (Annexure P-2).
2. Vide order dated 14.07.2022, the affected parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, for getting their respective statements recorded with regard to the compromise. The trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate was to submit a report in this regard giving certain details as enumerated in the said order.
3. Pursuant to the order dated 14.07.2022, passed by this Court, the parties have appeared before learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rewari, and as per report dated 16.08.2022, submitted to this Court, both the parties have got recorded their respective statements in Court. The operative part of the report received from learned Court below is as under:-
'4. The Statements of the parties and the statement of the Investigating Officer SI Suresh Kumar, No.528/Rewari, PP Meerpur, P.S.Dharuhera, in original are hereby forwarded to your honour for your honour's kind perusal. It is pertinent here to mention that the compromise entered into between the present parties appears to be genuine and entered into with their free will and consent and without any fear or pressure of any kind. It is also pertinent here to mention that as per the statement of the Investigating Officer, SI Suresh Kumar, No.528/Rewari, PP Meerpur, P.S.Dharuhera, Rewari the present FIR was registered against two accused persons namely Neha daughter of Azad Singh and Vijay son of Bijender and none of the above named accused have been declared proclaimed offender in any case and the present case is at the stage of investigation and the accused are yet to join the investigation of the present case and there is only one complainant namely Yashwani son of Sunder Singh and all the accused persons as well as the complainant are party to the present compromise.
The report is hereby submitted for your honour's kind perusal and necessary action as your honour may deem fit. '
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners urged that due to intervention of the respectable and elderly people of the society, the matter has been resolved and private parties have effected a compromise dated 29.06.2022 (Annexure P-2). At present, there remains no dispute amongst the private parties. He further submits that in view of the compromise so effected between the private parties, pendency of the impugned FIR and consequential proceedings emanating therefrom would be sheer abuse of the process of law.
5. Learned State counsel as also learned counsel for respondent No. 2, after going through the statements and the report received from learned Court below, very fairly admit that the private parties have resolved their dispute and effected a compromise and that they have no objection if the impugned FIR and all the consequential proceedings are quashed on the basis of the compromise.
6. The Full Bench of this Court in the matter of Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, has observed as under:
'(28) To conclude, it can safely be said that there can never be any hard and fast category which can be prescribed to enable the Court to exercise its power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. The only principle that can be laid down is the one which has been incorporated in the Section itself, i.e., "to prevent abuse of the process of any Court" or "to secure the ends of justice'.
(29) In Mrs. Shakuntala Sawhney v. Mrs. Kaushalya Sawhney and others, Hon'ble Krishna Iyer, J. aptly summoned up the essence of compromise in the following words:
'The finest hour of justice arrives propitiously when parties, despite falling apart, bury the hatchet and weave a s
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another
Kulwinder Singh and others v. State of Punjab and another
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others v. State of Gujarat and another
The court emphasized the power of the court to quash proceedings to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, especially in cases of compromise between the parties.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of compromise in modern society and the need to exercise the power under Section 482 to prevent abuse of the process of court and se....
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, especially in cases where a genuine compromise between th....
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings based on a genuine compromise between private parties to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the....
The court emphasized the significance of compromise in modern society and the wide power of the court to quash proceedings under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of law and secure the ends....
The court can exercise its power under Section 482 to quash criminal proceedings if the compromise between the parties is genuine and voluntary, and the pendency of the litigation would be an abuse o....
The voluntary nature of the compromise and the court's power to prevent abuse of the process of law by quashing proceedings based on genuine compromises.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties to prevent abuse of process of law an....
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine and voluntary compromise between the parties, considering the nature of the....
The court can exercise its inherent power under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of law and secure the ends of justice, especially in cases where a compromise between the partie....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.