ANOOP CHITKARA
Vimal Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. - The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 382 | 24.11.2015 | Focal Point, Distt. Ludhiana, Punjab | 406, 420 IPC and Section 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC added later on |
2. During the pendency of the petition, accused Vimal Mahajan has expired and the other accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.
3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved person as respondent.
4. On 18.8.22, the aggrieved person Rohit Jain (R-2) appeared before the JMIC, Ludhiana and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 25.8.22, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedi
C.B.I., New Delhi v. Duncans Agro Industries Ltd., Calcutta
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Jagjit Singh
Gold Quest International Private Limited v. State of Tamil Nadu
JayrajsinhDigvijay singh Rana v. State of Gujarat
Madan Mohan Abbot v. State of Punjab
Narinder Singh &Ors. vs. State of Punjab &Ors. [(2014) 6 SCC 466
ParbatbhaiAahir v State of Gujarat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.