JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J.

1. The petitioner, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, has come up before this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person.

2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.

3. After that, the petitioner came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved person as respondent.

4. On 29-04-2022, the aggrieved person Sheemu Bansal, (R-2) stated before the SDJM, Kalka and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 29-04-2022, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat.

ANALYSIS & REASONING:

5. Despite the severe oppositio