ANOOP CHITKARA
Mohd. Javed – Appellant
Versus
State Of Ut, Chandigarh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara J. - The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the aggrieved person.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 46 | 06.03.2020 | East Sector 26, Chandigarh | 341, 323, 34 & 397 (as 397 IPC was added later in into challan) |
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.
3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, impleading the aggrieved person as respondent.
4. On 6.6.22, the aggrieved person Ashwani Kumar (R-2) appeared before the ASJ, Chandigarh and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and consequent proceedings. As per the concerned court's report dated 6.6.22, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat.
ANALYSIS & REASONING:
5. Despite
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.