PANKAJ JAIN
Anil Taneja – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Pankaj Jain, J. (Oral) - This is a petition under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondents No.2 and 3 in case bearing FIR No.1190 dated 29.12.2021, registered under Sections 379 and 406 of IPC (Sections 467, 468, 471 and 420 of IPC were added later on).
2. While granting anticipatory bail, the trial Court observed as under:-
"xx xx xx
7. It is not a disputed fact that earlier, the FIR was registered against the applicants-accused under Sections 379 and 406 IPC. It is also an admitted fact that both the applicants-accused were admitted to anticipatory bail vide orders dated 18.02.2022 and 25.03.2022 by the court of Shri G.S.Wadhwa, the then learned ASJ, Hisar. Subsequently, offences under sections 467, 468, 471 and 420 IPC were added in the FIR. In the FIR, the complainant has alleged that both the applicants-accused were his employees whereas in the bail application, it is the plea of the applicants- accused that they had jointly entered into a partnership with the complainant to run the colleges. From the overall perusal of the facts, it appears that dispute between both the parties pertain to the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.