SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 934

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J.
Varinder Kumar & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRM-M-37497 of 2021 (O&M)
Decided On : 17-05-2022

Advocates:
Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sunil Chadha, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Lakshay Bector, Advocate, for the Respondent.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a complete chain of circumstances to ascertain the involvement of an accused.

Headnote:

NDPS Act - Criminal Revision No. 822 of 2021 - Section 227 of Cr.P.C, 1973 - Sections 22 and 29 of NDPS Act - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the application under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. seeking discharge and the challenge to the order dated 24.03.2021 passed by the Special Court. The court also considered the quashing of FIR No. 0069 dated 12.08.2019 under Sections 22 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The key legal provisions discussed include the admissibility of evidence under Section 27 of the Evidence Act and the requirement for a complete chain of circumstances to ascertain the involvement of an accused.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved the challenge to the order seeking discharge under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. and the quashing of FIR No. 0069 dated 12.08.2019 under Sections 22 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The court found that there was prima facie evidence indicating the involvement of the accused in the commission of the offence. The issues included the admissibility of evidence and the probative value of the evidence collected by the Investigating Agency.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that there was prima facie evidence indicating the involvement of the accused in the commission of the offence. The court dismissed the petitions but directed the trial Court to conclude the prosecution evidence expeditiously.

Issues: The issues included the admissibility of evidence under Section 27 of the Evidence Act and the probative value of the evidence collected by the Investigating Agency.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that there was prima facie evidence indicating the involvement of the accused in the commission of the offence. The court also emphasized the requirement for a complete chain of circumstances to ascertain the involvement of an accused.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitions but directed the trial Court to conclude the prosecution evidence expeditiously.

JUDGMENT

Vinod S. Bhardwaj. J. - Two petitions viz. Criminal Revision No. 822 of 2021 titled as " Sunil Kumar @ Sonu versus State of Punjab " and Criminal Miscellaneous No.37497 of 2021 titled as "Varinder Kumar versus State of Punjab" are being decided by a common order.

2. The parties agree that the dispute in question can be decided through one single order as both the petitions arise from the same FIR. While Criminal Revision No. 822 raises a challenge to the order dated 24.03.2021 passed by the Judge, Special Court, Bathinda on an application submitted by the petitioner under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "the Cr.P.C".) seeking discharge in case FIR No. 69 dated 12.08.2019 registered at Police Station Thermal, Bathinda under Sections 22 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred as the "NDPS Act"), the criminal miscellaneous No. 37497 of 2021 has been filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the FIR No. 0069 dated 12.08.2019 along with all consequential proceedings.

FACTS OF CRIMINAL REVISION No. 822 of 2021

3. Briefly, the facts of the case are that the FIR in question was registered on the statement of Inspector Gurdeep Singh. A secret information is stated to have been received by the Police Officer when he was present at Rose Garden Chowk in Government vehicle bearing No. PB-65-D-9070 driven by ASI Harbans Singh, 945 in connection with patrolling and checking of intoxicants when he informed that one Sunil Kumar @ Sonu S/o Rashpal Kumar Aggarwal resident of Maur Mandi, who is confined in Central Jail, Bathinda in FIR No. 100 dated 11.07.2019 registered under Section 22 of the NDPS Act at Police Station Maur, when he was out of the Jail, he had kept a pile of intoxicant tables in some transport. Hence, a ruqa in this regard was sent through Constable Gagandeep Singh, 1869 for registration of the case. DSP of the area was also requested through telephone to reach at the spot. Production warrants of the accused Sunil Kumar @ Sonu were obtained and he was taken in custody in the instant case. Upon interrogation, a disclosure statement of Sunil Kumar @ Sonu was recorded with the police that he had ordered 2,34,000 tablets of Tredol- 100 that are packed in 10 boxes and have been brought through Jaipur Golden Transport from Padampur Gujarat and are lying concealed in the store rooms of Kothari Transport under tarpaulin. It was also contended that owner of the transport has no idea about the same and that he had gone to seek delivery of the said consignment, however, the same could not be released to him as he was not in possession of the Billity. The said statement was duly recorded and the police officials went to the spot and also associated independent private witnesses. The accused Sunil Kumar @ Sonu produced before Inspector Gurdeep Singh 10 boxes of intoxicant tablets from under a tarapaulin lying in a room of Kothari Transport. Upon opening of each box, there were 117 boxes containing 200 tablets each. Thus a total of 2,34,000 intoxicant tablets make of Tredol-100 were recovered. All the boxes were marked with Serial numbers and parcels were prepared. The sample parcels were prepared and sealed and after verification were taken into possession, the site plan was prepared. Statements of witness were also recorded. On returning, ASI Farvinder Singh produced the case property. On 14.08.2019, Sub Inspector Khem Chand produced the accused along with the case property in the Court where the Magistrate on seeing the sealed parcel of intoxicant tablets, broke the seal and took out 1-1 strip from the parcel and prepared 20 samples parcels and the remaining parcels of intoxicant tablets measuring 23380 was sealed. The accused Sunil Kumar @ Sonu was interrogated and on the basis of statement of one Krishan Banal son of Sohan Lal, Varinder Kumar son of Surinder Kumar (petitioner in CRM-M-37497-2021) was nominated as an accused. It is f

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top