IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sureshwar Thakur, J.
Raman Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab - Respondent
CRA-S-44 of 2022 (O&M)
Decided On : 24-02-2022
NDPS Act - Smuggling of Heroin - Section 21 of the NDPS Act - Summary: The court discussed the prosecution's evidence, including the recovery of heroin from the accused, the non-consent memo, and the FSL report. It highlighted the lack of evidence linking the FSL report to the seized heroin, leading to the quashing of the conviction and sentence.
Fact of the Case:
The accused faced trial for smuggling heroin. The prosecution's evidence included the recovery of heroin from the accused, non-consent memo, and FSL report. The accused pleaded false implication and requested defense evidence, but did not produce any witness.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to connect the FSL report to the seized heroin, leading to the quashing of the conviction and sentence imposed on the accused.
Issues: The key issue was the lack of evidence linking the FSL report to the seized heroin, which influenced the court's decision to quash the conviction and sentence.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the lack of evidence linking the FSL report to the seized heroin, highlighting the failure of the prosecution to establish a crucial link in the case.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the judgment convicting the accused was quashed and set aside, and the accused was ordered to be set at liberty.
JUDGMENT
Sureshwar Thakur. J. - Accused one Raman Kumar faced trial for a charge qua commission of an offence punishable under Section 21 of the NDPS Act, 1985. After the conclusion of trial, entered upon by the learned trial Judge concerned, upon Sessions case bearing No. 417/2015, the learned trial Judge concerned, made a verdict of conviction upon the afore drawn charges against the accused.
2. Through a separate sentencing order, drawn on 23.12.2021, he proceeded to sentence the convict, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term extending upto four years, and, also sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/-. In default of payment of fine, he sentenced the convict to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four months.
3. The aggrieved convict one Raman Kumar, through his instituting the instant appeal bearing No. CRA-S-44-2022, before this Court, has cast a challenge upon both the verdict of conviction, and, qua theorder of sentence (supra), as became imposed upon him, by the learned trial Judge concerned.
4. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that on 21.06.2014, Inspector Ravinder Singh alongwith other police officials, in connection with naqabandi was present in Bus Stand Gharinda. There he received secret information against Raman Kumar son of Rikhi Ram, resident of village Dhande that he is indulged in smuggling of heroin and used to sell the heroin. It was informed that said Raman Kumar was coming in his Car Maruti having registration No. PB-02-AE-2123 from village Dhande to Amritsar via Attari, if naka is held and huge quantity of heroin could be recovered from him. On the basis of secret information, Inspector Ravinder Singh alongwith other police officials held naka on the bridge of drain in the area of Gharinda Chowk towards Amritsar side and started checking of the vehicles. In the meantime, one car bearing PB-02-AE-2123 came from the side of Attari, which was being driven by a clean shaved person. He made signal to stop the car and when car was stopped, on asking driver of car, disclosed his identity as Raman Kumar. Inspector Ravinder Singh disclosed his identity to Raman Kumar and told him that he was having suspicion that said person was having intoxicant material in his possession for which search was to be conducted. Inspector Ravinder Singh further disclosed the said person about his legal right to get his search conducted from a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. Accused replied that he wanted to get the search conducted from a Gazetted Officer. Accordingly non consent memo was prepared. Then Inspector Ravinder Singh requested DSP Sub Division Attari namely Shri Daljit Singh Dhillon to reach the spot and briefed him about the facts of the case, who after sometime reached at the spotalongwith his staff. DSP Daljit Singh disclosed his identity to the accused that he is Daljit Singh Dhillon, PPS DSP Sub Division Attari and further told the accused that there was suspicion of some intoxicant substance in his possession for which his search as well as search of his car was to be conducted for which he can arrange. Accused reposed confidence in DSP on which consent memo of the accused was prepared by DSP, it was signed by accused. Thereafter, personal search of accused was conducted and from the right pocket of the trouser worn by accused heroin wrapped in a polythene black colour bag was recovered. From the recovered heroin, 10 grams heroin was separated as sample and was kept in a plastic container. On weighing the remaining heroin, came to be 190 grams, which was put in different plastic container. Two separate parcels were prepared and were sealed with the seal impression 'RS' and 'DS'. Sample seals were prepared and Form M-29 was filled at th spot. Accused was arrested. Ruqa was sent to the Police Station on the basis of which FIR was registered against the accused. On return to police station, Inspector Ravinder Singh handed over the Car Maruti having registration number plate alongwith its RC
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the prosecution to establish a clear and unbroken link between the FSL report and the seized contraband to prove the charge und....
The prosecution must maintain an unbroken chain of custody for evidence; failure to do so can result in acquittal due to reasonable doubt.
The necessity of complying with statutory requirements for personal search, preservation of case property, and the production of untampered case property in court as primary evidence to prove the cha....
The prosecution must establish a clear and unbroken chain of custody and evidence handling to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt.
The prosecution must establish a convincing link in the chain of incriminatory evidence to prove the charge against the accused.
The prosecution must prove possession of narcotics beyond a reasonable doubt, and any procedural lapses do not necessarily invalidate the trial if evidence remains intact.
Strict compliance with the statutory provisions of the NDPS Act, particularly in cases involving the seizure and disposal of contraband, is crucial to establish the integrity of the evidence and the ....
The prosecution must establish an unbroken chain of evidence in drug-related cases; failure to do so results in reasonable doubt and acquittal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.