Paramjit Singh @ Pammi @ Soni vs State Of Punjab

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(P&H) 954

VIKAS BAHL
Paramjit Singh @ Pammi @ Soni – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent

Advocates:
Mr. Jagram Singh Cooner, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sarabjit S. Cheema, AAG, Punjab., for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Vikas Bahl, J. (Oral) - Challenge in the present Criminal Revision Petition is to the judgment dated 22.10.2021, passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moga, vide which the petitioner had been convicted under Sections 279 and 304-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the IPC") and had sentenced him as under: -

Offence	Sentence	Fine	Sentence in default of payment of fine.
304-A IPC	To undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year	Rs.1000/-	To further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month
279 IPC	To undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months	Rs.1000/-	To further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one month
Both the sentences shall run concurrently.

2. Challenge has also been made to the judgment 31.03.2022 passed by the Sessions Judge, Moga vide which the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the abovesaid judgment dated 22.10.2021, had been dismissed and sentenced of imprisonment has been upheld.

3. The brief background of the present case is that FIR No.93 dated 21.09.2015 was registered u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(P&H) 954

VIKAS BAHLParamjit Singh @ Pammi @ Soni – AppellantVersusState Of Punjab – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

VIKAS BAHL
Paramjit Singh @ Pammi @ Soni – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent