IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
Amritpal Kaur - Appellant
Versus
Mohinder Kaur & Ors. – Respondents
RSA-2838 of 2016 (O&M)
Decided On : 20-04-2022
Will - Property Inheritance - Registration Act, 1908 - Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Fact of the Case:
The plaintiff filed a suit claiming succession to the property left by the deceased. The trial court found the plaintiff to be the owner of 1/4th share, while the first appellate court held her to be the owner of half share. The plaintiff challenged the findings.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the Will was proved and the suit was barred by limitation. It also determined the inheritance shares of the heirs based on the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The court upheld the findings of the first appellate court.
Issues: 1. Admissibility of certified copy of Will under Section 57 of the Registration Act, 1908. 2. Suit barred by limitation. 3. Inheritance shares of heirs under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
Ratio Decidendi: The Will was proved as per Section 68, 69, and 71 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The suit was held to be barred by limitation as the plaintiff was aware of the Will and mutation entry. The inheritance shares were determined based on the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the findings of the first appellate court.
JUDGMENT
Anil Kshetarpal, J. - Questioning the correctness of judgment and decree passed by the learned First Appellate Court, the plaintiff has filed the present appeal.
In the considered view of the Court the following issues arise for consideration:-
Issue No.1:- Whether a certified copy issued by the Registrar in accordance with Section 57 of the Registration Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1908 Act") with respect to a registered Will is admissible in evidence, particularly when the record from the Sub-Registrar has been produced in order to verify the correctness of the certified copy?
Issue No.2:- Whether the suit claiming succession can be filed at any point of time particularly when the revenue authorities have already changed the entries (mutation) in favour of the other heirs of the deceased?
Issue No.3:- Whether two widows left behind by a male would inherit the property to the extent of one share jointly or will they inherit one share each?
2. A pedigree table would facilitate the Court to understand inter se relationship between the parties:-
3. It is evident from the perusal of the pedigree table that Avtar Singh left behind two widows namely late Smt. Ranjit Kaur and Smt. Mohinder Kaur. From the lions of Sh. Avtar Singh, Smt. Ranjit Kaur gave birth to two children namely Smt. Amritpal Kaur (plaintiff) and late Ms. Narinder Pal Kaur. Ms. Narinder Pal Kaur is stated to have died after the death of Sh. Avtar Singh and after the death of Ms. Narinder Pal Kaur, Smt. Ranjit Kaur also died. Similarly, from the lions of Sh. Avtar Singh, Smt. Mohinder Kaur gave birth to two children Sh. Veer Inder Singh and Smt. Jaswinder Kaur. Late Sh. Avtar Singh died on 28.06.1980. During his lifetime, he was an owner of various properties including agricultural land located in four different villages namely Sayianwala, Wan, Buttar and Jhoke Sarkari. On the death of Sh. Avtar Singh, the property located in villages Buttar and Jhoke Sarkari was mutated in favour of Smt. Mohinder Kaur (widow) and Sh. Veer Inder Singh on the basis of registered Will dated 08.10.1979, left behind by Sh. Avtar Singh. Whereas, the immovable property located in Village Sayianwala and Wan were mutated on the basis of natural succession in accordance with Schedule I of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Sh. Veer Inder Singh and Smt. Mohinder Kaur executed various sale deeds in favour of defendants No.4 and 5 in the year 2000. Smt. Amritpal Kaur, the married daughter of late Sh. Avtar Singh filed the suit on 12.04.2001, claiming that after the death of Sh. Avtar Singh all the six family members sat together and entered into a family settlement according to which the various properties located in village Sayianwala and Wan were decided to be given to Smt. Ranjit Kaur, Smt. Amritpal Kaur and Ms. Narinder Pal Kaur, whereas, the various properties located in village Jhoke Sarkari and Buttar fell to the share of Smt. Mohinder Kaur, Sh. Veer Inder Singh and Smt. Jaswinder Kaur. The plaintiff also asserted that Smt. Mohinder Kaur and Sh. Veer Inder Singh agreed that they shall not inherit the property on the basis of a registered Will dated 08.10.1979. In the alternative, it was pleaded that the alleged Will dated 08.10.1979, is wrong, illegal, null, void, false and fabricated as the same has been prepared by defendant No.1 to 3 in collusion with the scribe and the marginal witnesses.
The plaintiff claims that the sale deeds executed by defendant No.1 and 2 namely Smt. Mohinder Kaur and Sh. Veer Inder Singh, are against the family settlement and, therefore, not binding on her rights.
4. The defendant No.1 and 2 filed a joint written statement and while asserting that the suit is time barred. It was asserted that the plaintiff has no right, title or interest in the various properties including agricultural land left by Sh. Avtar Singh located in village Buttar and Jhoke Sarkari in view of the registered Will left behind by Sh. Avtar Singh on 08.10.1979. A separate writ
Dhanpat Vs. Sheo Ram (deceased) through his legal representatives and others
Harjinder Singh Vs. Ranjit Kaur and others
Rajesh Yadav and others Vs. Balbir Singh and others 2014 (5) RCR(Civ) 941
The judgment establishes the admissibility of certified copies of Wills under Section 57 of the Registration Act, 1908, and the determination of inheritance shares under the Hindu Succession Act, 195....
Validity of a Will depends on proving execution with at least one supporting attesting witness; failure to do so renders the Will invalid under applicable laws.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the fulfillment of legal requirements for proving a Will and the production of sufficient evidence to remove suspicious circumstances, thereby upho....
The execution of a will must strictly adhere to statutory requirements, including valid attestation by witnesses, and mere registration does not suffice to validate a will in the presence of suspicio....
A will can be proved through secondary evidence when attesting witnesses are unavailable, provided the statutory requirements for execution are met.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.