Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DEEPAK GUPTA
Anguri – Appellant
Versus
Khazani (since deceased) represented by her legal heirs – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of property ownership. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. defendants' arguments against plaintiffs' claims. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. issues framed in both suits. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. analysis of appeals and court decisions. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. discussion on the validity of the will. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. legal requirements for proving a will. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 7. court's considerations on evidence regarding the will. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 36) |
| 8. hurdles in proving the will. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 9. court's conclusion regarding the validity of the will. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 10. final ruling on the appeals. (Para 50) |
JUDGMENT
This judgment shall dispose of two appeals – RSA No.168 of 1993 {arising out of Civil Suit No. 140 of 1984 titled as “Khazani Devi and another vs Smt. Sarti and others” (hereinafter referred as 'first suit') and Civil Appeal No.238 of 1991 titled as “Smt. Khazani and another vs Smt. Sarti and others”}; and RSA No.169 of 1993 {arising out of Civil Suit No. 414/1 of 1984 titled as “Sarti vs Smt. Khajani and others” (hereinafter referred as 'second suit') and Civi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
