IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
Tarlok Singh & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
Jasbir Singh & Ors. – Respondents
CR-2642 of 2021 (O&M)
Decided On : 10-02-2022
Clerical Error - Amendment of Judgment - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 152, 153
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, as decree-holders, sought correction of a judgment and decree sheet due to a clerical error in the description of land in a suit for joint possession. The trial court dismissed the application, leading to the revision petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there was a clerical error in the description of the land and that the provisions of Section 152 and 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, enable the court to correct such errors in judgments, decrees, or pleadings to determine the real question or issue raised by the parties.
Issues: The main issue was whether the court could permit the correction of a clerical error in the judgment and decree sheet under Section 152 and 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the provisions of Section 152 and 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, allow for the correction of clerical or arithmetical mistakes in judgments, decrees, or pleadings to determine the real question or issue raised by the parties.
Final Decision: The revision petition was allowed, the order under challenge was set aside, and the application for permission to amend the plaint was allowed. The lower court was directed to amend the judgment and decree to rectify the error and give true effect to its meaning.
JUDGMENT
Anil Kshetarpal, J (Oral). - The hearing of the case is being held through video conferencing on account of restricted functioning of the Courts.
2. The petitioners are decree-holders. Their suit for grant of decree of joint possession was decreed on 07.05.2008. The aforesaid judgment and decree dated 07.05.2008 has been affirmed in First Appeal, Regular Second Appeal as well as Special Leave to Appeal. The plaintiffs filed an application under Section 151, 152 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for correction of the judgment and decree sheet. It was pointed out that due to oversight or typographical error 2/15th share of the land measuring 9 kanals 15 marlas has been decreed in their favour whereas it should be 94 kanals 15 marlas. The typographical error is patent from reading of the relevant part of the caption of the suit, which is extracted as under:-
(i) Land measuring 12K-12 1/2 M i.e 2/15 share of land measuring 9K-15M comprised in Khewat No.107, 120, 121, 122, Khatauni no.164, 178, 179, 180, Rect. No.23 Killa No.13, Rect.no.32, Killa no.21, Rect.No.43, Killa No.5,6/1, 7/3, 8, 9, 15, 24/1, 24/2, 24/3, 25, Rect.No.32 Killa no.24, Rect.No.44, Killa No.1, 10, 11, Rect.no.43, Killa No.12/2, 13/3, 14, Rect.No.23, Killa No.18, Rect.no.43, Killa No.1."
3. It is evident that the plaintiffs have claimed that they are entitled to joint possession of land measuring 12 kanals and 12 1/2 marlas being 2/15th share of land measuring 94 kanals 15 marlas. The total land cannot be 9 kanals 15 marlas because the plaintiffs claim that they are in joint possession of the land measuring 12 kanals 12 1/2 marlas. Moreover, the complete and correct description of the land with reference to khewat, khatoni, rectangle and killa numbers has been given. The total area of the aforesaid land described in the caption comes to 94 kanals and 15 marlas.
4. The trial court has dismissed the application on the ground that the errors in the pleadings cannot be permitted to be corrected in exercise of powers under Section 152 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and with their able assistance perused the paper book. Learned counsel representing the petitioners contends that there is a clerical error in the plaint and they could not be deprived of the fruits of the decree only on that account. He further contends that Section 152 and 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, enable the court to correct the clerical or arithmetical mistakes, not only in the judgments and decrees, but also permit the parties to carry out such corrections, which are a result of any accidental slip or omission, in the pleadings, which ultimately travel to the judgment and the decree. Per contra, learned counsel representing the judgment debtor has, vehemently, opposed the prayer on the ground that at this stage, the omission in the plaint cannot be permitted to be corrected.
6. From the reading of the caption of the plaint, it is obvious that there is a clerical error due to an accidental slip/omission. There is also no dispute that the complete description of land measuring 94 kanals 15 marlas has itself been given in para reproduced above. It is also obvious that the plaintiffs claim for joint possession measuring 12 kanals and 12 1/2 marlas in caption no.1, which cannot be 2/15th share of land measuring 9 kanals 15 marlas. If we make a simple arithmetical calculation, the total land would be 94 kanals and 15 marlas, so as to give effective meaning to 2/15th share of land which is equivalent to 12 kanals and 12 1/2 marlas. Further, the plaintiff has already given the complete details of the land involved in the suit. The sum total of various khasra numbers also come to 94 kanals 15 marlas.
7. At this stage, it is considered appropriate to carefully examine Section 152 and 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which are extracted as under:-
"Section 152 - Clerical or arithmetical mistakes in judgments, decrees or Orders or errors
AI
The provisions of Section 152 and 153 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, allow for the correction of clerical or arithmetical mistakes in judgments, decrees, or pleadings to determine the real que....
The court affirmed that amendments under Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure are limited to clerical or arithmetical errors and do not extend to substantive changes affecting the merits of the....
Inadvertent clerical errors in judgments can be corrected under Section 152 of the C.P.C. without altering substantive decisions.
Section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure permits correction of clerical errors in decrees to ensure they accurately reflect the court's intention.
Clerical errors in judgments or decrees can be corrected under Section 152 of the Civil Procedure Code, even if they originated from the pleadings, to ensure justice and accuracy in legal documentati....
Civil courts have the inherent power to correct clerical errors and mistakes arising from accidental slips or omissions in judgments, decrees, or orders, including those traceable to the pleadings of....
Amendment of judgment and decree – Power under Section 152 of CPC also extends to error committed by parties in their pleadings.
A satisfied decree cannot be amended under Section 152 of the C.P.C. as it is considered dead for all practical purposes.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.