SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 29

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
B.P.ROUTRAY
Susant Kumar @ Lita @ Litu Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
Santilata Sahoo – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A. Mishra

Table of Content
1. trial court's refusal to correct judgment error (Para 3 , 6)
2. petitioner's contention on jurisdiction error (Para 5)
3. court's power to correct clerical mistakes (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. identifying discrepancies in court's judgment (Para 12)
5. restoration of correct share to defendants (Para 13)

JUDGMENT :

1. Though some of the opposite parties have entered appearance but no one appears for them on call despite names of Lawyers are indicated in the list.

3. Present CMP is directed against order dated 28th March 2025 of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bhadrak passed in C.M.A. No.50 of 2024 (arising out of C.S. Case No.126 of 2000), wherein the prayer of the Petitioner to correct the judgment and decree in respect of recording of their share has been refused.

5. It is submitted by Mr. Mishra that, learned trial Court has erred in opining that he is lacking jurisdiction under section 152 of the C.P.C. to correct such error appearing in the judgment and decree with regard to share of the parties. It is submitted that though the finding in the judgment is in respect of share to the extent of 9 Anna 6 Pahi as per the noting reflected in the RoR under Ext.12, but t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top