SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1138

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Gurpreet Singh @ Kaku – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Naresh Kumar Manchanda, Advocate, for the Appellant ; Mr. Sandeep Singh Deol, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral) - CRM-1941-2022

Present application has been filed for placing on record the testimony of complainant Baldev Singh recorded before the trial Court as Annexure P-5.

Keeping in view the averments made in the application, the same is allowed and Annexure P-5 is permitted to be taken on record.

CRM-M-21033-2020 and CRM-M-26753-2021

2. By this common order, two petitions, the details of which have been given in the heading of the order, are being disposed of as these petitions arise out of the same FIR. Present two petitions have been filed for the grant of regular bail to the petitioners in respect of FIR No.184 dated 07.09.2019 registered under Sections 302, 34 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 at Police Station City Jagraon, District Ludhiana.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in fact, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case by the father of the deceased much after the incident had happened though, now during his testimony, he has resiled even from the said statement. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that in the present case, the petitioners along with the deceased were attacked b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top