SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1191

VIVEK PURI
Rahul Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate; for the Petitioner.; Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Aag, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Vivek Puri, J. (Oral) - Rahul Kumar-petitioner is seeking regular bail in the case bearing FIR No. 7 dated 05.02.2021, under Sections 376 IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012, registered at Police Station Narot Jaimal Singh, District Pathankot.

2. Briefly, the case has been registered on the statement of the mother of the victim alleging that on 02.02.2021 at about 11:30 AM, she returned back from the school where she was working as Class-IV employee and the victim informed her that Rahul Kumar son of Parshotam Lal committed rape upon her while she was working in the kitchen.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is in custody since 05.02.2021, is not involved in any other case and furthermore, during the course of trial, the victim has not identified the petitioner.

4. On instructions from ASI Tarsem Singh, learned State counsel has opposed the bail application on the score that the victim has imputed allegations of commission of rape against the petitioner in the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C.Be that as it may, during the course of trial, the victim has not identified the petitioner. It has emerged in the statement of the prosecutrix (Annexu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top