Deepak Bhatia vs State Of Haryana - 2022 Supreme(P&H) 1194

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(P&H) 1194

MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Deepak Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates:
Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate; for the Petitioner.; Mr. Apoorv Garg, Dag, Haryana; for the Respondent-State.; Ms. Prabhjot Kaur Bhatti, Advocate; for the Complainant.

JUDGMENT

Meenakshi I. Mehta, J. - Apprehending his arrest in the criminal case pertaining to the FIR bearing No.268 dated 22.08.2019 registered at Police Station Civil Line, Sirsa, under Sections 406 and 420 IPC, the petitioner has preferred this petition for seeking the relief of anticipatory bail.

2. Bereft of unnecessary details, the allegations, as levelled by complainant Harbhajan Singh Dhanju in the subject FIR, are that the father of the petitioner was his close acquaintance. In October 2011, the petitioner introduced him to his (petitioner's) co-accused Karamjit Singh Brar while disclosing that his said co-accused was the owner of V2 (half) share in PlotNo.2235, Sector 20, Part-3, HUDA, Sirsa and he (complainant) agreed to purchase the same for a sum of Rs.14,55,000/-. He had paid the afore-said amount to the said owner through the petitioner on different occasions who had been issuing the receipts in this regard. The petitioner also executed a receipt qua having received the entire amount of sale consideration from him (complainant) and then, an agreement qua the said sale transaction was executed but thereafter, the petitioner and his co-accused kept on dillydallying the ex

Click Here to Read the rest of this document